Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2013, 14 (1): 36-48

O čem se nemluví: Příspěvek k problematice sexuality terénního výzkumníka.

Gabriela Fatková

The essential attribute of socio-cultural anthropology and ethnography - fieldwork - is a process that interferes in the intimate lives of the population under observation, and that of the researcher as well. This study reconceptualises the issue of sexuality and gender, as they are for the individual the primary characteristic which determines a researcher's position in field. The article highlights the discrepancy between the way fieldwork techniques are taught, and the real practice of fieldwork. One solution could entail relaxing methodological formalism, which may be in practice unachievable, and the removal of the taboo surrounding the whole issue. Different strategies for dealing with the researchers' own sexuality and gender in the field, and their accompanying adaptation to the situation, are considered. Attention is paid to the issue of sexual violence in fieldwork.

Zveřejněno: 1. březen 2013  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fatková, Gabriela. 2013. "O čem se nemluví: Příspěvek k problematice sexuality terénního výzkumníka." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 14(1):36-48.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Altork, K. 2007. "Walking the Fire Line: The Erotic Dimension of the Fieldwork Experience." Pp. 92-107 in Robben, A. C. G. M., Sluka, J. A. (eds.). Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Behar, R., Gordon, D. A. (eds.). 1995. Women writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    3. Bell, D. et al. (eds.). 1993. Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography. London, New York: Routledge.
    4. Bernard, R. H. (ed.). 1998. The Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
    5. Budilová, L., Jakoubek, M. 2006. "Genealogická metoda a její použití při výzkumu v cigánské osadě." Pp. 145-158 in Akta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita.
    6. Campbell, J. K. 1964. Honour, family and patronage. London: Oxford University Press.
    7. Cassell, J., Jacobs, S. E. (eds.). 1997. Handbook of Ethical Issues in Anthropology. [online]. [cit. 5. 12. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ toc.htm>.
    8. Cesara, M. 1982. Reflections of a Woman Anthropologist: No Hiding Place. London: Academic Press.
    9. Clifford, J., Marcus, G. E. (eds.). 1986. Writing culture: The poetics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press. Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association. 2009. [online]. [cit. 10. 12. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf>.
    10. Cohen, A. P. 1994. Self consciousness: an alternative anthropology of identity. London, New York: Routledge.
    11. Crapanzano, V. 1986. "'Hermes' Dilemma: the Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description." Pp. 51-76 in Clifford, J., Marcus, G. E. (eds.). Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Csordas, T. 2011. "Embodiment: Agency, Sexual Difference, and Illness." Pp. 137-156 in Mascia-Lees, F. E. (ed.). A companion to the Anthropology aft he Body and Embodiment. Malden, MA: Willey - Blackwell. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Cupples, J. 2002. "The field as a landscape of desire: sex and sexuality in geographical fieldwork." Area, Vol. 34, No. 4: 382-390. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Dewalt, K. M., Dewalt, B. R., Wayland, C. B. 1998. "Participant observation." Pp. 259-299 in Bernard, R. H. (ed.). The Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
    15. Disman, M. 2002. Jak se vyrábí sociologická znalost. Praha: Karolinum.
    16. Ditton, J. 1977. Part-time Crime: an ethnographyof fiddling and pilferage. London: Macmillan. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Dubish, J. 1995. "Lovers in the field: sex, dominance and the female anthropologist." Pp. 29-50 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Etický kodex české asociace pro sociální antropologii. 2009. [online]. [cit. 1. 5. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://www.casaonline.cz/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Eticky_kodex_ CASA.doc>.
    19. Fatková, G. 2012. "'Paní učitelko, my nejsme plémě, my jsme národ': Formování etnických identit nedávno ještě kočovných Karakačanů." Pp. 79-104 in Fatková, G. et al. Balkán a nacionalismus: Labyrintem nacionální ideologie. Brno: Porta Balkanica.
    20. Gearing, J. 1995. "Fear and loving in the West Indies." Pp. 186-218 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Geertz, C. 1967. "Under the Mosquito Net." New York Review of Books. [online]. Vol. 9. No. 4. [cit. 5. 12. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1967/sep/14/under-the-mosquito-net/?pagination=false >.
    22. Geertz, C. 1990. Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Standford, California: Standford University Press. Golde, P. (ed.). 1970. Women in field: Anthropological experiences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    23. Good, K., Chanoff, D. 1981. Into the Heart: One Man's Pursuit of Love and Knowledge among the Yanomama. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    24. Hastrup, K. 1978. "The semantics of biology: Virginity." Pp. 49-65 in Ardener, S. (ed.). Defining females: The nature of women in society, New York: Halsted Press.
    25. Hendl, J. 2005. Kvalitativní výzkum: základní metody a aplikace. Praha: Portál.
    26. Henry, M. G. 2003. "'Where are you really from?': representation, identity and power in the fieldwork experiences of a South Asian diasporic." Qualitative research, Vol. 3, No. 2: 229-242. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Howell, N. 1990. Surviving Fieldwork: A Report of the Advisory Panel on Health and Safety in Fieldwork. Washington: American Anthropological Association. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Howell, N. 2007. "Human Hazards of Fieldwork." Pp. 234-244 in Robben, A. C. G. M., Sluka, J. A. (eds.). Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    29. Jakoubek, M. 2011. "Doslov: Antropologie v České republice." Pp. 323-337 in Eriksen, T. H. Etnicita a nacionalismus: Antropologické perspektivy. Praha: SLON.
    30. Jakoubek, M., Nešpor, Z. R. 2005. "Co je a co není kulturní/sociální antropologie." [online]. Antropowebzin, Vol. 1. [cit. 5. 12. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://antropologie.zcu.cz/co-je-a-neni-kulturnisocialni-antropologie>.
    31. Killick, A. P. 1995. "The penetrating intellect: on being white, straight and male in Korea." Pp. 76-106 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Kulick, D. 1995. "Introduction - The sexual life of anthropo logists: erotic subjectivity and ethnographers work." Pp. 1-28 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge.
    33. Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). 1995. Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge.
    34. Landes, R. 1970. "A woman anthropologist in Brazil." Pp. 119-142 in Golde, P. (ed.). Women in field: Anthropological experiences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    35. Malinowski, B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    36. Malinowski, B. 1967. Diary in the strict sense of the term. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
    37. Marcus, G. E. 1995. "Ethnography in/of the world systém: The emergence of multi-sited enthnography." Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 24: 95-117. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. Markowitz, F., Ashkenazi, M. (eds). 1999. Sex, Sexuality, and the Anthropologist. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    39. Massey, D. 2006. "Landscape as a provocation: reflections on moving mountains." Journal of Material Culture, No. 1-2: 33-48. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Moreno, E. 1995. "Rape in the field: reflection from a survivor." Pp. 219-250 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Morton, H. 1995. "My 'chastity' belt: avoiding seduction in Tonga." Pp. 168-185 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    42. Newton, E. 2000. Margaret Mead Made Me Gay. Durham & London: Duke University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    43. Okely, J. 2006. "Knowing without notes." Pp. 55-74 in Halstead, N. et al. (eds.). Knowing How to Know. Fieldwork and the Ethnographic Present. Oxford, New York: Berghahn Books.
    44. Paul, B. 1953. "Interview techniques and field relationships." Pp. 430-451 in Kroeber, A. L. et al. (eds.) Anthropology Today. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    45. Pertierra, A. C. 2007. "Anthropology that warms your heart: on being a bride in the field." [online]. Anthropology Matters, Vol. 9, No. 1. [cit. 12. 12. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php?journal=anth_matters&page=article&op=view&path]=55&path]=>. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    46. Plavjaniková, L., Růžička, M. 2005. "Psychologické aspekty terénního výzkumu (Terénní výzkum jako přechodový rituál)." Pp. 11-17 in Lenk, L. et al. (eds.). Argonauti za obzorem západu. Plzeň: Dryada.
    47. Pollard, A. 2009. "Field of creams: Difficulty and Ethnographic Fieldwork." [online]. Anthropology Matters, Vol. 11, No. 2. [cit. 1. 11. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php?journal=anth_matters&page=article&op=viewArticle&path]=10&path]=>. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    48. Punch, M. 1994. "Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research." Pp. 83-98 in Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    49. Rabinow, P. 1978. Reflexion of fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    50. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1922. The Andaman islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    51. Ruby, J. (ed.). 1982. A Crack in the mirror: Reflexive Perspective in Anthropology. Philadelphia: The University od Pennsylvania Press.
    52. Sciama, L. 1993. "The Problem of Privacy in Mediterranean Anthropology." Pp. 87-111 in Ardener, S. (ed.). Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps. Oxford, New York: Berg. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. Silverman, D. 2005. Ako robiť kvalitatívny výskum. Bratislava: Ikar.
    54. Wade, P. 1993. "Sex and Masculinity in Fieldwork among Colombian Blacks." Pp. 199-214 in Bell, D. et al. (eds.). Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography. London, New York: Routledge.
    55. Wilson, M. 1995. "Perspective and difference: sexualization, the field, and the ethnographer." Pp. 251-275 in Kulick, D., Wilson, M. (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London, New York: Routledge.
    56. Wynn, L. 2009. "Making ethics training ethnography-friendly." [online]. [cit. 10. 12. 2012]. Dostupné z: <http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2009/04/23/making-ethics-ethnography-friendly/>.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah