Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2016, 17 (2): 64-75 | DOI: 10.13060/12130028.2016.17.2.283

Nothing for the Girls? The Gender Gap in Political Participation on Social Network Sites

Lenka Vochocová, Jaromír Mazák, Václav Štětka

Nothing for the Girls? The Gender Gap in Political Participation on Social Network Sites
This paper elaborates on the authors' previous research on the relatively unexplored area of the gender aspects of online political participation. Quantitative content analysis is used to analyse communication on selected Czech political parties' Facebook profiles during the campaign for the parliamentary elections in 2013 and 2014. The article focuses on women's presence in political discussions and the relationship between their presence and the negativity of the communication in the forum, and presents a literature review offering possible explanations for the surprising difference in both the activity of men and women and the differences in the activity of female participants on the profile pages of different parties. The results of this research challenge some established assumptions about the alleged narrowing of the gender gap in the Internet environment and in social media specifically, as men turn out to be much more active than women.

Keywords: online political participation, gender, election campaigns

Published: June 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vochocová, Lenka, Jaromír Mazák, and Václav Štětka. 2016. "Nothing for the Girls? The Gender Gap in Political Participation on Social Network Sites." Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research 17(2):64-75.
Download citation

References

  1. Bode, L. 2016. "Closing the Gap. Gender Parity in Political Engagement on Social Media." [first online]. Information, Communication & Society [cit. cit. 19. 6. 2015], http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1202302. Go to original source...
  2. Bourque, S. C., Grossholtz, J. 1974. "Politics an Unnatural Practice: Political Science Looks at Female Participation." Politics & Society, No. 4: 225-266, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003232927400400205. Go to original source...
  3. Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S. 1997. "The Public Consequences of Private Inequality: FamilyLlife and Citizen Participation." American Political Science Review, No. 91: 373-389, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2952362. Go to original source...
  4. Carpentier, N. 2011. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol & Chicago: Intellect. Go to original source...
  5. Casteltrione, I. 2015. "The Internet, Social Networking Web Sites and Political Participation Research: Assumptions and Contradictory Evidence." First Monday, Vol. 20, No. 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i3.5462. Go to original source...
  6. Coffé, H., Bolzendahl, C. 2010. "Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation." Sex Roles, No. 62: 318-333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199009-9729-y. Go to original source...
  7. Coleman, S., Blumler, J. G. 2009. The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Communication, Society, and Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Correa, R., Hinsley, A. W., Gil de Zúñiga, H. 2010. "Who Interacts on the Web? The Intersection of Users´ Personality and Social Media Use." Computers in Human Behavior, No. 26: 247-253, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003. Go to original source...
  9. Dahlgren, P. 2005. "The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation." Political Communication, Vol. 22, No. 2: 147-162, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160. Go to original source...
  10. Dahlgren, P. 2013. The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Davis, A. 2010. "New Media and Fat Democracy: The Paradox of Online Participation." New Media & Society, Vol. 12, No. 5: 745-761, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341435. Go to original source...
  12. Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., Wollebaek, D. 2012. "Social Media and Mobilization to Offline Demonstrations: Transcending Participatory Divides?" New Media & Society, Vol. 15, No. 6: 890-908, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462844. Go to original source...
  13. Gallego, A. 2007. Inequality in Political Participation: Contemporary Patterns in European Countries. Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California.
  14. Garcia-Blanco, I. 2014. "Discussing the News on Social Media: An Analysis of Citizens' Democratic Values and Aspirations." Příspěvek prezentovaný na European Communication Conference v Lisabonu, 12.-14. 11. 2014.
  15. Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M. 2013. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?" The Journal of Politics, No. 75: 701-716, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431. Go to original source...
  16. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Puig-I-Abril, E., Rojas, H. 2009. "Weblogs, Traditional Sources Online and Political Participation: An Assessment of How the Internet Is Changing the Political Environment." New Media & Society, Vol. 11, No. 4: 553-574, doi: 10.1177/1461444809102960. Go to original source...
  17. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S. 2012. "Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation." Journal of Computer & Mediated Communication, Vol. 17: 319-336, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x. Go to original source...
  18. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., Zheng, P. 2014. "Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships." Journal of Communication, Vol. 64, No. 4: 612-634, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103. Go to original source...
  19. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A.,Vraga, E., Shah, D. 2014. "Digital Democracy: Reimagining Pathways to Political Participation." Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1: 36-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331680903316742. Go to original source...
  20. Hampton, K. N., Sessions Goulet, L., Rainie, L., Purcell, K. 2011. Social Networking Sites and Our Lives. How People´s Trust, Personal Relationships, and Civic and Political Involvement are Connected to Their Use of Social NetworkingSsites and Other Technologies. Washington: Pew Research Center´s Internet & American Life Project.
  21. Harrison, L., Munn, J. 2007. "Gendered (Non)participants? What Constructions of Citizenship Tell Us about Democratic Governance in the Twenty-first Century." Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 60, No. 3: 426-436, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm016. Go to original source...
  22. Himelboim, I., Sweetser, K. D, Tinkham, S. F., Cameron, K., Danelo, M., West, K. 2016. "Valence-based Homophily on Twitter: Network Analysis of Emotions and Political Talk in the 2012 Presidential Election." New Media & Society, Vol. 18, No. 7: 1382-1400, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814555096. Go to original source...
  23. Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., Ljungberg, E. 2013. "Age and the Effects of News Media Attention and Social Media Use on Political Interest and Participation: Do Social Media Function as Leveller?" European Journal of Communication, No. 28: 19-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323112465369. Go to original source...
  24. Hooghe, M., Hosch-Dayican, B., van Deth, J. 2014. "Conceptualizing Political Participation."Acta Politica, Vol. 49, No. 3: 337-348, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.7. Go to original source...
  25. Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., Lee, A. 2012. "A Tale of Two Sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the Personality Predictors of Social Media Usage." Computers in Human Behavior, No. 28: 561-569, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001. Go to original source...
  26. Jakubowicz, K. 2013. Nová ekologie médií. Konvergence a mediamorfóza. Zlín: Radim Bačuvčík - VeRBuM.
  27. Joiner, R., Stewart, C., Beaney, C., Moon, A., Maras, P., Brosnan, M. 2014. "Publically Different, Privately the Same: Gender Differences and Similarities in Response to Facebook Status Updates." Computers in Human Behavior, No. 39: 165-169, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.004. Go to original source...
  28. Junco, R. 2013. "Inequalities in Facebook Use." Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 6: 2328-2336, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.005. Go to original source...
  29. Jungherr, A. 2012. "The German Federal Election of 2009: The Challenge of Participatory Cultures in Political Campaigns." Transformative Works and Cultures, Vol. 5, No. 10, http://dx.doi.org/10.3983/twc.2012.0310. Go to original source...
  30. Lilleker, D. G., Jackson, N. A. 2010. "Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning: The Impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 General Election." Policy & Internet, Vol. 2, No. 3: 67-96, http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/19442866.1064. Go to original source...
  31. Lin, K.-Y., Lu, H.-P. 2011. "Why People Use Social Networkig Sites: An Empirical Study Integrating Network Externalities and Motivation Theory." Computers in Human Behavior, No. 27: 1152-1161, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009. Go to original source...
  32. Linek, L. 2013. Kam se ztratili voliči? Volební účast v ČR v letech 1990-2010. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie.
  33. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., Campanella Bracken, C. 2002. "Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability." Human Communication Research, Vol. 28, No. 4: 587-604, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x. Go to original source...
  34. Lorber, J. 1998. Gender Inequality. Feminist Theories and Politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
  35. Lupač, P., Chrobáková, A., Sládek, J. 2014. Internet v České republice 2014. Světový projekt o Internetu - Česká republika. [online]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova. [cit. 19. 6. 2015]. Dostupné z: www.worldinternetproject.net.
  36. Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., Meckel, M. 2014. "Beyond Just Politics: A Systematic Literature Review of Online Participation." First Monday, Vol. 19, No. 7: 1-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.5260. Go to original source...
  37. McLaughlin, L. 1993. "Feminism, the Public Sphere, Media and Democracy." Media, Culture & Society, No. 15: 599-620, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01634439301500 4005. Go to original source...
  38. Neumayer, C., Schossböck, J. 2011. "Political Lurkers? Young People in Austria and Their Political Life Worlds Online." Pp. 131-143 in Parycek, P., Kripp, M. J., Edelmann, N. (eds.). CeDEM11: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. Krems: Edition-Donau-Universität.
  39. Norris, P. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  40. Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  41. Norris, P., Lovenduski, J., Campbell, R. 2004. Gender and Political Participation. [online]. Electoral Commission. [cit. 11. 3. 2014]. Dostupné z: www.electoralcommission. org.uk.
  42. Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B. 2013. "Gender and Public Talk: Accounting for Women´s Variable Participation in the Public Sphere." Sociological Theory, Vol. 31, No. 4: 291-317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735275113515172. Go to original source...
  43. Rojas, H., Puig-i-Abril, E. 2009. "Mobilizers Mobilized: Information, Expression, Mobilization and Participation in the Digital Age." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, No. 14: 902-927. Go to original source...
  44. Strandberg, K. 2013. "A Social Media Revolution or Just a Case of History Repeating Itself? The Use of Social Media in the 2011 Finnish Parliamentary Elections'." New Media & Society, Vol. 15, No. 8: 1329-1347, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812470612. Go to original source...
  45. Štětka, V., Vochocová, L. 2014. "A Dialogue of the Deaf, or Communities of Debate? The Use of Facebook in the 2013 Czech Election Parliamentary Elections Campaign." Teorija in Praksa, roč. 51, č. 6: 1361-1380.
  46. Švelch, J., Vochocová, L. 2015. "Sociální média jako nová výzva pro výzkum politické participace." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, roč. 51, č. 1: 65-88, http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2015.51.1.154. Go to original source...
  47. van Deth, J. 2014. "A Conceptual Map of Political Participation." Acta Politica, roč. 49, č. 3: 349-367, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.6. Go to original source...
  48. Vesnic-Alujevic, L. 2012. "Political Participation and Web 2.0 in Europe: A Case Study of Facebook." Public Relations Review, No. 38: 466-470, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010. Go to original source...
  49. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., Lampe, C. 2011. "It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election." Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, No. 14: 107-114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0226. Go to original source...
  50. Vochocová, L., Štětka, V., Mazák, J. 2016. "Good Girls Don't Comment on Politics? Gendered Character of Online Political Participation in the Czech Republic." Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 19, No. 10: 1321-1339, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088881. Go to original source...
  51. Vráblíková, K. 2009. "Politická participace a její determinanty v postkomunistických zemích." Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, č. 5: 867-897. Go to original source...
  52. Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., Bergman, J. 2003. "Who Participates and Why?: An Analysis of Citizens on the Internet and the Mass Public." Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21, No. 1: 26-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439302238969. Go to original source...
  53. Young, I. M. 1981. "Beyond the Unhappy Marriage: A Critique of the Dual Systems Theory." Pp. 43-70 in Sargent, L. (ed.). Women and Revolution. Boston: South End Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.