Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2022, 23 (2): 114-139 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2022.015

Using a Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies Approach to Analyse Gender: A Case Study of German Radiology Reports

Karoline Irschara
Department of Linguistics, University of Innsbruck

This paper explores how a Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) approach can be utilised to investigate representations of gender as well as potential gender bias in radiology reporting, which constitutes a form of professional, medical discourse. The database collected for this purpose consists of three specialised German sub-corpora (332,901 cranial, thoracic, and whole-body computed tomographies, with more than 61 million tokens), which were extracted from a larger medical corpus called MedCorpInn that was built as part of an interdisciplinary project conducted jointly by the University of Innsbruck and Innsbruck Medical University. As a basic premise, CTs are assumed discursive, linguistic events, which are influenced by social and institutional factors. They represent an essential everyday communicative practice among radiologists and referring doctors and they function both as documentation and as a legal record of imaging procedures. To investigate whether there are differences and/or subtle similarities (Taylor 2018; Brezina 2018) in the largely standardised reports on female vs on male patients, a CADS-approach focusing on gender is applied. Keywords, collocation, and concordance techniques will be introduced and used to explore how male and female patients are discussed in the medical discourse studied here. Research into internal clinical communicative practices could also be of interest from the perspective of gender medicine.

Keywords: healthcare communication; discourse studies; medical discourse; language and gender; gender bias

Received: March 19, 2022; Revised: November 29, 2022; Accepted: November 30, 2022; Published: January 22, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Irschara, Karoline. 2022. "Using a Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies Approach to Analyse Gender: A Case Study of German Radiology Reports." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 23(2):114-139.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adolphs, S., B. Brown, R. Carter, P. Crawford, O. Sahota. 2004. Applying Corpus Linguistics in a Health Care Context. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 9-28. Go to original source...
    2. Allen, B. J., K. Garg. 2016. Diversity Matters in Academic Radiology: Acknowledging and Addressing Unconscious Bias. Journal of the American College of Radiology 13 (12): 1426-1432. Go to original source...
    3. Anthony, L., P. Baker. 2015. ProtAnt. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (3): 273-292. Go to original source...
    4. Baker, P. 2014. Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.
    5. Baker, P., G. Brookes. 2021. Lovely Nurses, Rude Receptionists, and Patronising Doctors: Determining the Impact of Gender Stereotyping on Patient Feedback. Pp. 559-571 in J. Angouri, J. Baxter (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Go to original source...
    6. Bartley, E. J., R. B. Fillingim. 2013. Sex Differences in Pain: A Brief Review of Clinical and Experimental Findings. British Journal of Anaesthesia 111 (1): 52-58. Go to original source...
    7. Beach, M. C., S. Saha, J. Park, J. Taylor, P. Drew, E. Plank, L. A. Cooper, B. Chee. 2021. Testimonial Injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and Women. Journal of General Internal Medicine 36 (6): 1708-1714. Go to original source...
    8. Benoit, K., K. Watanabe, H. Wang, P. Nulty, A. Obeng, S. Müller, A. Matsuo. 2018. Quanteda: An R Package for the Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data. Journal of Open Source Software 3 (30): 774. Go to original source...
    9. Brezina, V., T. McEnery, S. Wattam. 2015. Collocations in Context: A New Perspective on Collocation Networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 139-173. Go to original source...
    10. Brezina, V. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    11. Brookes, G. 2020. Corpus Linguistics in Illness and Healthcare Contexts: A Case Studyof Diabulimia Support Groups. Pp. 44-72 in Z. Demjén (ed.). Applying Linguistics in Illness and Healthcare Contexts. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Go to original source...
    12. Bubenhofer, N. 2009. Sprachgebrauchsmuster. Korpuslinguistik als Methode der Diskurs- und Kulturanalyse. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
    13. Bubenhofer, N. 2018. Serialität der Singularität. LiLi Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 48 (2): 357-388. Go to original source...
    14. Bührig, K., B. Meyer. 2004. Ad-Hoc-Interpreting and the Achievement of Communicative Purposes in Doctor-Patient-Communication. Pp. 43-62 in J. House, J. Rehbein. Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, Multilingual Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Go to original source...
    15. Crawford, P., B. Brown, K. Harvey. 2014. Corpus Linguistics and Evidence-Based Health Communication. Pp. 75-90 in W. S. Chou, H. Ehrenberger Hamilton (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication. London, New York: Routledge.
    16. Demmen, J., E. Semino, Z. Demjén, V. Koller, S. Payne, A. Hardie, P. Rayson. 2017. The Online Use of Violence and Journey Metaphors by Patients with Cancer, as Compared with Health Professionals: A Mixed Methods Study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 7 (1): 60-66. Go to original source...
    17. Egbert, J., T. Larsson, D. Biber. 2020. Doing Linguistics with a Corpus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    18. Elwyn, G., D. Frosch, R. Thomson, N. Joseph-Williams, A. Lloyd, P. Kinnersley, E. Cording, D. Tomson, C. Dodd, S. Rollnick, A. Edwards, M. Barry. 2012. Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27 (10): 1361-1367. Go to original source...
    19. Feldman, S., W. Ammar, K. Lo, E. Trepman, M. van Zuylen, O. Etzioni. 2019. Quantifying Sex Bias in Clinical Studies at Scale with Automated Data Extraction. JAMA Network Open 2 (7): e196700. Go to original source...
    20. Firth, J. R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics: 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press.
    21. Gabrielatos, C., A. Marchi. 2012. Keyness: Appropriate Metrics and Practical Issues. Presented at CADS International Conference 2012, Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. University of Bologna, Italy.
    22. Gabrielatos, C. 2018. Keyness Analysis: Nature, Metrics and Techniques. Pp. 225-258, in C. Taylor, A. Marchi (eds.). Corpus Approaches to Discourse. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
    23. Goetz, L. H., N. J. Schork. 2018. Personalized Medicine: Motivation, Challenges, Progress. Fertility and Sterility 109 (6): 952-963. Go to original source...
    24. Hahn, U., J. Wermter. 2004. An Annotated German-Language Medical Textcorpus as Language Resource. LREC'04 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: 473-476.
    25. Hagiwara, N., J. E. Lafata, B. Mezuk, S. R. Vrana, M. D. Fetters. 2019. Detecting Implicit Racial Bias in Provider Communication Behaviors to Reduce Disparities in Healthcare: Challenges, Solutions, Future Directions for Provider Communication Training. Patient Education and Counseling 102 (9): 1738-43. Go to original source...
    26. Helbig, G., J. Buscha. 2017. Deutsche Grammatik. München: Ernst Klett.
    27. Hoffmann, D. E., A. J. Tarzian. 2001. The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias against Women in the Treatment of Pain. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 29 (1): 13-27. Go to original source...
    28. Hunt, D., G. Brookes. 2020. Corpus, Discourse and Mental Health. London: Bloomsbury. Go to original source...
    29. Iakushevich, M. 2021. 'Immer mehr Menschen fallen in Depressionen'. Mediale Konstruktionen einer Volkskrankheit. Pp. 399-418 in M. Iakushevich, Y. Ilg and T. Schnedermann (eds.). Linguistik und Medizin. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    30. Ilg, Y. 2021. Medizinische Terminologie im öffentlichen Diskurs. Konjunkturen und Veränderungen von Schizophrenie. Pp. 219-240 in M. Iakushevich, Y. Ilg and T. Schnedermann (eds.). Linguistik und Medizin. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    31. Irschara, K., C. Posch, B. Waldner, A.-L. Huber, B. Glodny, L. Gruber, S. Mangesius. 2022. Building the MedCorpInn-Corpus - Issues and Goals. Pp. 163-192 in C. Posch, K. Irschara, G. Rampl (eds.). Wort - Satz - Korpus. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.
    32. Jaworska, S., K. Ryan. 2018. Gender and the Language of Pain in Chronic and Terminal Illness: A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis of Patients' Narratives. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 215: 107-114. Go to original source...
    33. Jefferson, L., K. Bloor, Y. Birks, C. Hewitt, M. Bland. 2013. Effect of Physicians' Gender on Communication and Consultation Length: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 18 (4): 242-248. Go to original source...
    34. Knuchel, D. 2021. Diskurs-Latenz: Re-Aktivierungen von Stereotypen rund um HIV/AIDS in Onlineforen. Pp. 277-294 in M. Iakushevich, Y. Ilg and T. Schnedermann (eds.). Linguistik und Medizin. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    35. Kotthoff, H., D. Nübling. 2018. Genderlinguistik. Eine Einführung in Sprache, Gespräch und Geschlecht. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
    36. Lalouschek, J. 1995. Ärztliche Gesprächsausbildung: Eine diskursanalytische Studie zu Formen des ärztlichen Gesprächs. Radolfzell: Verl. für Gesprächsforschung.
    37. Lemnitzer, L., H. Zinsmeister. 2015. Korpuslinguistik: Eine Einführung. 3rd ed. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
    38. McEnery, T., A. Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    39. Menz, F., J. Lalouschek, C. Stöllberger, J. Vodopiutz. 2002. Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede bei der Beschreibung von akutem Brustschmerz: Ergebnisse einer medizinisch-linguistischen Studie. Linguistische Berichte (191): 343-366. Go to original source...
    40. Menz, F., J. Lalouschek. 2006. I Just Can't Tell You How Much It Hurts. Gender-Relevant Differences in the Description of Chest Pain. Pp. 133-154 in F. Salager-Meyer, M. Gotti (eds.). Linguistic Insights, v. 45. Bern, New York: P. Lang.
    41. Menz, F., A. Al-Roubaie. 2008. Interruptions, Status and Gender in Medical Interviews: The Harder You Brake, the Longer It Takes. Discourse & Society 19 (5): 645-666. Go to original source...
    42. Menz, F. 2010. Doctor-Patient Communication. Pp. 330-344 in R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, P. Kerswill (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics. London: Sage. Go to original source...
    43. Overlach, F. 2008. Sprache des Schmerzes - Sprechen über Schmerzen: Eine grammatisch-semantische und gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung von Schmerzausdrücken im Deutschen. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
    44. Partington, A. 2008. The Armchair and the Machine: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Corpora for University Language Teachers. Pp. 189-213 in C. Taylor-Torsello (ed.). Corpora for University Language Teachers. Bern: Peter Lang.
    45. Partington, A., A. Duguid, C. Taylor. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Go to original source...
    46. Perkuhn, R., H. Keibel, M. Kupietz. 2012. Korpuslinguistik. Paderborn: Fink. Go to original source...
    47. Pschyrembel. 2020. Pschyrembel - Klinisches Wörterbuch. 268., neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
    48. Reiche, D. 2003. Roche-Lexikon Medizin. 5th edition. Munich: Urban & Fischer.
    49. Reisigl, M. 2010. Prolegomena zu einer Semiotik des Schmerzes. Pp. 71-140 in F. Menz, J. Lalouschek, M. Sator, K. Wetschanow (eds.). Sprechen über Schmerzen: Linguistische, kulturelle und semiotische Analysen. Duisburg: Univ.-Verl. Rhein-Ruhr.
    50. Ribeiro, B. T., D. de Souza Pinto, C. Gruber Mann. 2014. Mental Healthcare Professionals' Role Performance: Challenges in the Institutional Order of a Psychiatric Hospital. Pp. 389-406 in W. S. Chou, H. Ehernberger Hamilton (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication. London, New York: Routledge.
    51. Scharloth, J., N. Bubenhofer. 2011. Datengeleitete Korpuspragmatik: Korpusvergleich als Methode der Stilanalyse. Pp. 195-230 in E. Felder, M. Müller, F. Vogel (eds.). Korpuspragmatik. Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
    52. Schütte, C. 2021. 'Ist das denn noch normal?' Diskurslinguistische Stichproben zur Aushandlung von 'Normalität' in Online- Trauer-Foren. Pp. 379-398 in M. Iakushevich, Y. Ilg and T. Schnedermann (eds.). Linguistik und Medizin. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    53. Sieverding, M., F. Kendel. 2012. Geschlechter(rollen)aspekte in der Arzt-Patient-Interaktion. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 55 (9): 1118-1124. Go to original source...
    54. Spitzmüller, J., I. H. Warnke. 2011. Diskurslinguistik. Eine Einführung in Theorien und Methoden der transtextuellen Sprachanalyse. Berlin: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    55. Taylor, C. 2018. Similarity. Pp. 19-37 in C. Taylor, A. Marchi (eds.). Corpus Approaches to Discourse. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
    56. Vitale, C., G. Rosano, M. Fini. 2016. Are Elderly and Women Under-Represented in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials? Implication for Treatment. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 128 (7): 433-438. Go to original source...
    57. West, C. 1984. Routine Complications: Troubles with Talk between Doctors and Patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    58. Wiese, I. 1984. Fachsprache der Medizin: Eine linguistische Analyse. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
    59. Wodak, R. 1981. Women Relate, Men Report: Sex Differences in Language Behaviour in a Therapeutic Group. Journal of Pragamatics 5: 261-285. Go to original source...
    60. BY-NC Karoline Irschara, 2022.BY-NC Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i., 2022.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content