Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2021, 22 (1): 148-177 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2021.006

‘In the End They All Have to Turn the Wheel the Same Way’: Gender, Age, And Embodiment in the Work of Public Transport Drivers

Radka Dudová
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.

The article explores the meanings of gender, embodiment, and ageing in the work of public transport drivers. This profession is been strongly masculinised: men outnumber women and driving has traditionally been understood as men's work. The article asks the following questions: how have the working conditions in this profession changed and what does this mean for the people who perform it and for their interpretations of the work? What does the process of prolonging working lives on one side and technological development on the other bring to this profession? This is a case study of a 'man's job' in the situation where the working population is ageing and technological changes are occurring. The text is based on a qualitative study of drivers of buses, trolleybuses, and trams who are over the age of 50, and it is accompanied by interviews with HR managers and trade union representatives. It contributes to our understanding of the 'embodiment' of work: it shows how specific gendered bodies with their differences are invisible or are regarded as obstacles at work. The embodied workers compare and adapt themselves to the abstract idea of the universal worker, which in reality corresponds to nothing.

Keywords: work, body, embodiment, ageing, gender, drivers, transport

Received: November 26, 2020; Revised: June 29, 2021; Accepted: June 29, 2021; Published: August 30, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dudová, Radka. 2021. "‘In the End They All Have to Turn the Wheel the Same Way’: Gender, Age, And Embodiment in the Work of Public Transport Drivers." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 22(1):148-177.
Download citation

References

  1. Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender and Society 4 (2): 139-158. Go to original source...
  2. Axelrad, H., T. K. Mcnamara. 2018. Gates to Retirement and Gender Differences: Macroeconomic Conditions, Job Satisfaction, and Age. Journal of Women & Aging 30 (6): 503-519, https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2017.1358978. Go to original source...
  3. Bytheway, B. 1995. Ageism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  4. Calasanti, T. 2004. Feminist Gerontology and Old Men. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 59 (6): 305-314, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.6.S305. Go to original source...
  5. Charles, M., D. B. Grusky. 2004. Occupational Ghettos. The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Go to original source...
  6. Cockburn, C. 1981. The Material of Male Power. Feminist Review. (9): 41-58, doi: 10.2307/1394914. Go to original source...
  7. Cockburn, C. 1985. Machinery of Dominance. London: Pluto Press.
  8. Cockburn, C. 2009. On 'The Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men, and Technical Know-How.' Women's Studies Quarterly 37 (1/2): 269-273, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27655158. Go to original source...
  9. Comeau, T. D., C. L. Kemp. 2007. Intersections of Age and Masculinities in the Information Technology Industry. Ageing and Society 27: 215-232, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X06005605. Go to original source...
  10. Crawley, S. L. 2011. Visible Bodies, Vicarious Masculinity, and 'The Gender Revolution': Comment on England. Gender and Society 25 (1): 108-112, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210389814. Go to original source...
  11. Crowley, M. 2013. Gender, the Labor Process and Dignity at Work. Social Forces 91 (4): 1209-1238, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210389814. Go to original source...
  12. ČSÚ. 2019. Struktura mezd zaměstnanců 2019. Staženo 1. 11. 2020. (https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/struktura-mezd-zamestnancu-2019).
  13. Davaki, K., C. Marzo, E. Narminio, M. Arvanitidou. 2013. Discrimination Generated by the Intersection of Gender and Disability. Brussels: European Parliament, (http://www.prois-nv.ro/%0Adocs/Discrimination Generated by the Intersection of Gender and Disability.pdf).
  14. Dudová, R., K. Pospíšilová (v tisku). Why Women Retire Earlier: What Is behind Women's Earlier Labour Market Exit in the Czech Republic. SociologickýčČasopis / Czech Sociological Review.Duncan, C., W. Loretto. 2004. Never the Right Age? Gender and Age-Based Discrimination in Employment. Gender, Work and Organization 11 (1): 95-115, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00222.x. Go to original source...
  15. Erel, U. 2007. Constructing Meangful Lives: Biographical Methods in Research on Migrant Women. Sociological Research Online 17 (4): 35-48. Go to original source...
  16. Flink, J. 1988. The Automobile Age. London: MIT Press.
  17. Foucault, M. 1980. The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
  18. Frone, M. R., M. Russell, M. L. Cooper. 1992. Prevalence of Work-family Conflict: Are Work and Family Boundaries Asymmetrically Permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior 13 (7): 723-729, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130708. Go to original source...
  19. Ganster, D. C., J. Schaubroeck. 1991. Work Stress and Employee Health. Journal of Management 17 (2): 235-271, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700202. Go to original source...
  20. Gimlin, D. 2007. What Is 'Body Work'? A Review of the Literature. Sociology Compass 1 (1): 353-370, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00015.x. Go to original source...
  21. Gubrium, J. F., J. A. Holstein. 2003. Analyzing Interpretive Practice. Pp. 214-48 in N. K., Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds.). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: Sage.
  22. Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
  23. Hastings, T., D. Mackinnon. 2017. Re-embedding Agency at the Workplace Scale : Workers and Labour Control in Glasgow Call Centres. Environment and Planning 49 (1): 104-120, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16663206. Go to original source...
  24. Hearn, J. 1995. Imaging the Aging of Men. Pp. 97-118 in M. Featherstone, A. Warnick (eds.). Images of Aging: Guttural Representations of Later Life. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  25. Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart. The Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkley: University of California Press.
  26. Holton, M. 2020. On the Geographies of Hair : Exploring the Entangled Margins of the Bordered Body. Progress in Human Geography 44 (3): 555-571, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519838055. Go to original source...
  27. Itzin, C., C. Phillipson. 1995. Gendered Ageism: A Double Jeopardy for Women in Organizations. Pp. 84-94 in C. Itzin, J. Newman (eds.). Gender, Culture and Organizational Change: Putting Theory Into Practice. London, New York: Routledge.
  28. Jyrkinen, M., L. McKie. 2012. Gender, Age and Ageism: Experiences of Women Managers in Finland and Scotland. Work, Employment and Society 26 (1): 61-77, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011426313. Go to original source...
  29. Kolářová, K. 2012. Jinakost - Postižení-- Krititika: Společenské konstrukty nezpůsobilosti a hendikepu. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  30. Křížková, A., H. Hašková, K. Pospíšilová. 2018. Zdravotní znevýhodnění, gender a vzdělání na trhu práce v intersekcionální perspektivě. Gender a výzkum, 19 (2): 102-134, http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/25706578.2018.19.2.428. Go to original source...
  31. Lingard, H., M. Turner. 2021. Exploring the Relationship between Bodily Pain and Work-life Balance among Manual/non-managerial Construction Workers. Community, Work and Family, 1-18. Online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1868409. Go to original source...
  32. McDowell, L. 2009. Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310214.ch3. Go to original source...
  33. Mellström, U. 2004. Machines and Masculine Subjectivity: Technology as an Integral Part of Men's Life Experiences. Men and Masculinities 6 (4): 368-382, https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260960. Go to original source...
  34. Oliver, M., C. Barnes. 1998. Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion. London: Longman.
  35. Oxley, T. 1998. Menstrual Management: An Exploratory Study. Feminism & Psychology 8 (2): 185-191, https://doi.org/10.1177/095935359800800205. Go to original source...
  36. Powel, J. L., P. Taylor. 2016. Rethinking Risk and Ageing : Extending Working Lives. Social Policy & Society 15 (4): 637-645, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000270. Go to original source...
  37. Reskin, B. F., P. Roos. 1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  38. Sedláková, R. 2008. Čas jako kapitál: ze života řidičů dálkové dopravy. Pp. 105-134 in R. Dudová (ed.). Nové šance a rizika. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
  39. Smith, S., N. W. Swanson, B. Gökariksel. 2016. Territory, Bodies and Borders. Area 48 (3): 258-261, https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12247. Go to original source...
  40. Sorenson, B. A. 1984. The Organisational Woman and the Trojan Horse Effect. Pp. 88-105 in H. Holter (ed.). Patriarchy in a Welfare Society. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  41. Stanworth, C. 2002. Women and Work in the Information Age. Gender, Work & Organization 7 (1): 20-32, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00090. Go to original source...
  42. Taylor, P. E., A. Walker. 1994. The Ageing Workforce: Employers' Attitudes Towards Older People. Work , Employment & Society 8 (4): 569-591, https://doi.org/10.1177/095001709484005. Go to original source...
  43. Vidovićová, L. 2008. Stárnutí, věk a diskriminace - nové souvislosti. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  44. Wajcman, J. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  45. Wajcman, J. 2004. Technofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  46. Whitehead, S. 2002. Men and Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  47. Williams, C. L. 1995. Still a Man's World: Men Who Do Women's Work. Berkley: California University Press. Go to original source...
  48. Witz, A. 2000. Whose Body Matters? Feminist Sociology and the Corporeal Turn in Sociology and Feminism. Body and Society 6 (1): 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006002001. Go to original source...
  49. Wolkowitz, C. 2006. Bodies at Work. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  50. Zampoukos, K. 2021. The Hospitable Body at Work - A Research Agenda. Gender, Work & Organization. Online first, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12635. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.