Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2024, 25 (1): 56-79 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2024.005

Choosing the Lesser Evil: The Anti-Gender Movement in Kazakhstan in the Context of Coloniality

Altynay Kambekova ORCID...
University of Bonn, Center for Development Research

When it comes to the topic of antigenderism, most scholarly and international advocacy works concentrate on the (East) European context, leaving the countries of the so-called ‘third world’ invisible. However, if we look beyond the idea that anti-gender movements are intrinsic only to countries that are moving away from modernity, we can see that the phenomenon also exists in other geographical contexts. In this regard, Kazakhstan presents an interesting case. Over the course of the last few years, there has been a rise in state-sponsored anti-gender activities backed by citizen movements that are advocating against ‘gender ideology’. Looking at this from a decolonial perspective, the anti-gender movement in Kazakhstan is a peculiar case, as, on the one hand, the traditionalist discourse relies on essentialist notions of identity, especially in relation to restoring ‘true Kazakhness’ from pre-Soviet times, while, on the other hand, when it comes to the attacks on feminism and human rights, it is possible to observe a shift in discourse towards the ideas of Western ideological imperialism. This echoes the rhetoric that has been deployed by the Russian anti-gender movement, and this discourse sometimes even uses the same messages and sources. This paper analyses how the anti-gender movement in Kazakhstan navigates between resistance to the Russian and Soviet colonial past and present-day Western coloniality and (re)defines traditions in this context.

Keywords: anti-gender movement, Kazakhstan, sexual politics

Received: September 30, 2023; Revised: July 9, 2024; Accepted: July 11, 2024; Published: August 21, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kambekova, Altynay. 2024. "Choosing the Lesser Evil: The Anti-Gender Movement in Kazakhstan in the Context of Coloniality." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 25(1):56-79.
Download citation

References

  1. Akorda. 2019. President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev's State of the Nation Address. Official Website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved 10 April 2024 (https://www.akorda.kz/en/addresses/addresses_of_president/president-of-kazakhstan-kassym-jomart-tokayevs-state-of-the-nation-address-september-2-2019).
  2. Arystanbek, A. 2019. Central Asian Feminists Are Carving out Their Space in Gender Studies. openDemocracy. Retrieved 15 April 2024 (https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/central-asian-feminists-are-carving-out-their-space-gender-studies/).
  3. Arystanbek, A. 2021. Sex Education (or the Lack Thereof) in Kazakhstan: Heteronormative Propaganda in the Curriculum of Özin Özi Tanu/Samopoznanie. Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 22 (2): 11-27, https://doi.org/10.13060/gav.2021.017. Go to original source...
  4. Arystanbek, A., C. Schenk. 2022. Racializing Central Asia during the Russian-Ukranian War: Migration Flows and Ethnic Hierarchies. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 788.
  5. Azhigulova, K. 2021. Alt-Right Groups in Kazakhstan: How They Succeeded in Cancelling a Bill against Domestic Violence. The Foreign Policy Centre (blog). Retrieved 15 April 2022 (https://fpc.org.uk/alt-right-groups-in-kazakhstan-how-they-succeeded-in-cancelling-a-bill-against-domestic-violence/).
  6. Bissenova, A. 2023. Decolonizing 'the Field' in the Anthropology of Central Asia: 'Being There' and 'Being Here'. Pp. 82-95 in J. Féaux de la Croix, M. Reeves (eds.). The Central Asian World. London and New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  7. Butler, J. 2024. Who's Afraid of Gender? New York: Columbia University Press.
  8. Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  9. Chatterjee, P. 1989. Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonialized Women: The Contest in India. American Ethnologist 16 (4): 622-633. Go to original source...
  10. Cupać, J., I. Ebetürk. 2020. The Personal is Global Political: The Antifeminist Backlash in the United Nations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22 (5): 702-714, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120948733. Go to original source...
  11. Denkovski, D., N. Bernarding, K. Lunz. 2021. Power Over Rights: Understanding and Countering the Anti-Gender Campaigns, Vol. 1. Berlin: Centre for Feminist Foreign Policy. Retrieved 10 August 2023 (https://centreforfeministforeignpolicy.org/2022/11/15/power-over-rights-understanding-and-countering-the-anti-gender-campaigns/).
  12. Edelman, L. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Go to original source...
  13. Edenborg, E. 2021. Anti-Gender Politics as Discourse Coalitions: Russia's Domestic and International Promotion of 'Traditional Values'. Problems of Post-Communism 11: 175-184, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1987269. Go to original source...
  14. Esimkhanov, M., P. Bannikov, A. Zhapisheva. 2021. Dosie: Kto stoit za lobbirovaniyem otmeny zakonov i rasprostraneniyem konspiralogii v Kazakhstane? (Dossier: Who is behind the lobbying for changes to the laws and the spread of conspiracy in Kazakhstan?) Factcheck.kz (blog). Retrieved 24 February 2023 (https://factcheck.kz/socium/dose-kto-stoit-za-lobbirovaniem-otmeny-zakonov-i-rasprostraneniem-konspirologii-v-kazaxstane/).
  15. Fairclough N., R. Wodak 1997. Critical discourse analysis. Pp. 258-284 in T. Van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
  16. Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
  17. Gradskova, Y. 2020. Recovering Traditions? Women, Gender, and the Authoritarianism of 'Traditional Values' in Russia. Baltic Worlds 8 (1): 31-36.
  18. Graff, A., E. Korolczuk. 2022. Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  19. Grzebalska, W., E. Kováts, A. Petö. 2017. Gender as Symbolic Glue: How 'Gender' Became an Umbrella Term for the Rejection of the (Neo)liberal Order. Political Critique. hal-03232926.
  20. Hovhannisyan, S. 2019. Anti-Genderism in the Non-West: Looking from the Other Side. Engenderings. (blog) Retrieved 25 April 2022 (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2019/01/03/anti-genderism-in-the-non-west-looking-from-the-other-side/).
  21. Insebayeva, N. 2022. Modernity, Development and Decolonization of Knowledge in Central Asia, Politics and History in Central Asia. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5117-5_6. Go to original source...
  22. Kamp, M. 2016. The Soviet Legacy and Women's Rights in Central Asia. Current History 115 (783): 270-276, https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2016.115.783.270. Go to original source...
  23. Kassymbekova, B. 2022. On Decentering Soviet Studies and Launching New Conversations. Ab Imperio 2022 (1): 115-120. Go to original source...
  24. Kassymbekova, B., E. Marat. 2022. Time to Question Russia's Imperial Innocence. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 771. Retrieved 30 June 2024 (https://www.ponarseurasia.org/time-to-question-russias-imperial-innocence/).
  25. Katsiveli, S., E. Coimbra-Gomes. 2020. Discursive Constructions Of the Enemy through Metonymy. The Case of CitizenGo's Anti-Genderist E-Petitions. Anglistica AION 24 (1): 9-23.
  26. Keller, R. 2011. The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD). Hum Stud 34: 43-65, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z. Go to original source...
  27. Keller, R. 2018. The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse: An Introduction. Pp. 16-47 in R. Keller, A.-K. Hornidge, W. J. Schünemann (eds.). The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse: Investigating the Politics of Knowledge and Meaning-Making. London and New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  28. Korolczuk, E. 2015. 'The War on Gender' from a Transnational Perspective - Lessons for Feminist Strategising. Pp. 43-54 in Heinrich Böll Foundation (eds.). Anti-Gender Movements on the Rise? Strategising for Gender Equality in Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
  29. Kováts, E. 2017. The Emergence of Powerful Anti-Gender Movements in Europe and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy. Pp. 175-189 in M. Köttig, R. Bitzan, A. Petö (eds.). Gender and Far-Right Politics in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. Go to original source...
  30. Kováts, E., M. Põim. 2015. Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe. Budapest: Foundation for the European Progressive Studies.
  31. Kudaibergenova, D. 2019. The Body Global and the Body Traditional: A Digital Ethnography of Instagram and Nationalism in Kazakhstan and Russia. Central Asian Survey 38 (3): 363-380, https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2019.1650718. Go to original source...
  32. Kudaibergenova, D., M. Laruelle. 2022. Making Sense of the January 2022 Protests in Kazakhstan: Failing Legitimacy, Culture of Protests, and Elite Readjustments. Post-Soviet Affairs 0 (0): 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2077060. Go to original source...
  33. Kuhar, R., D. Paternotte. 2017. Gender Ideology in Movement: Introduction. Pp. 1-23 in R. Kuhar, D. Paternotte (eds.). Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  34. Kumenov, A. 2022. Kazakhstan Joins Club of Countries Banning Lightyear over Same-Sex Kiss. Eurasianet. Retrieved 14 April 2024 (https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-joins-club-of-countries-banning-lightyear-over-same-sex-kiss).
  35. Levitanus, M. 2023. 'I Thought I'd Kill Myself When I Grew Up': Queer Childhood Narratives in Kazakhstan. Pp. 177-196 in D. Bühler-Niederberger, X. Gu, J. Schwittek, E. Kim. The Emerald Handbook of Childhood and Youth in Asian Societies: Generations Between Local and Global Dynamics. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. Go to original source...
  36. Loginova, O. 2024. V Kazakhstane Vvodyat Zapret na Nastavnichestvo Nad Det'mi-Sirotami dlya Predstaviteley LGBT. (In Kazakhstan, a Ban is Being Introduced on Mentoring Orphans for LGBT Representatives) Vlast.Kz. Retrieved 14 April 2024 (https://vlast.kz/novosti/58821-v-kazahstane-vvodat-zapret-na-nastavnicestvo-nad-detmi-sirotami-dla-predstavitelej-lgbt.html).
  37. Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2022. On Introducing Amendments and Additions to Some Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Strengthening the Institution of the Family. Astana: Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved 30 July 2023 (https://www.parlam.kz/ru/mazhilis/post-item/36/15301).
  38. Patalakh, A. 2018. Economic or Geopolitical? Explaining the Motives and Expectations of the Eurasian Economic Union's Member States. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (1): 31-48, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0191-x. Go to original source...
  39. Paternotte, D. 2020. Backlash: A Misleading Narrative. LSE Gender Blog. Retrieved 23 July 2023 (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2020/03/30/backlash-a-misleading-narrative/).
  40. Paternotte, D., R. Kuhar. 2018. Disentangling and Locating Politics and the 'Global Right': Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. Governance 6 (3): 6-19, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1557. Go to original source...
  41. Phillips, A. 2018. Gender and Modernity. Political Theory 46 (6): 837-860, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591718757457. Go to original source...
  42. Puar, J. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press. Go to original source...
  43. Public Ombudsman for Family Protection. 2019. Otrkytoe pis'mo protiv prinyatiya zakona o profilaktike semeino-bytovogo (domashnego) nasiliya. (An Open Letter Against the Adoption of the Law on the Prevention of Family-Domestic (Domestic) Violence) ouzs.ru. Retrieved 25 April 2022 (https://ouzs.ru/news/otkrytoe-pismo-prezidentu-putinu-po-zakonu-o-semeyno-bytovom-nasilii/).
  44. Rao, R. 2020. Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  45. Reisigl, M., R. Wodak. 2015. The Discourse-Historical Approach. Pp. 87-121 in R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies: Introducing Qualitative Methods series. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  46. Saderdinova, D. 2020. Roditeli Kazakhstana protiv yuvenalnoi yusticii! (Parents of Kazakhstan are Against Juvenile Justice!) CitizenGO. Retrieved 25 April 2022 (https://citizengo.org/ru/182635-snyat-s-rassmotreniya-v-parlamente-zakonoproekty-rk-o-protivodeystvii-semeyno-bytovomu).
  47. Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
  48. Suchland, J. 2018. The LGBT Specter in Russia: Refusing Queerness, Claiming 'Whiteness.' Gender, Place & Culture 25 (7): 1073-1088, https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1456408. Go to original source...
  49. Tlostanova, M. 2015. Can the Post-Soviet Think? On Coloniality of Knowledge, External Imperial and Double Colonial Difference. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics 1 (2): 38-58, https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i2.38. Go to original source...
  50. Tokaev, K. 2024. Remarks by President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev at the Third Meeting of the National Kurultai 'Fair Citizen - Fair Labour - Fair Wages'. Astana: Official Website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Akorda.Kz. Retrieved 16 April 2024 (https://www.akorda.kz/en/1-1525938).
  51. Tokayev, K. 2021. Qasym-Jomart Toqayev v Twittere. Twitter. Retrieved 15 April 2022 (https://twitter.com/TokayevKZ/status/1352216053124898816).
  52. Ukhova, D. 2018. 'Traditional Values' for the 99%? The New Gender Ideology in Russia. Engenderings. (blog) Retrieved 9 April 2022 (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2018/01/15/traditional-values-for-the-99-the-new-gender-ideology-in-russia/).
  53. UN. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved 9 April 2022 (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child).
  54. Vaal, T. 2024. Ugolovnuyu Otvetstvennost' za Propogandu LGBT Predlagayut Vvesti Deputaty ot Pravyashchei Partii. (Criminal Liability for LGBT Propaganda Proposed by Deputies from the Ruling Party) Vlast.Kz. Retrieved 10 April 2024 (https://vlast.kz/novosti/59686-ugolovnuu-otvetstvennost-za-propagandu-lgbt-predlagaut-vvesti-deputaty-ot-pravasej-partii.html).
  55. Van Dijk, T. 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis. Pp. 466-485 in D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, D. Schiffrin (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 2. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Go to original source...
  56. Wodak, R., M. Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  57. Wodak, R. 2018. We Have the Character of an Island Nation: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of David Cameron's 'Bloomberg Speech' on the European Union. Pp. 27-58 in M. Kranert, G. Horan (eds.). Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.