Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2024, 25 (2): 93-116

Time to Change the 'Change': Stigma and Support in Blogs about the Menopause

Keren Darmon ORCID...
University of Greenwitch

This article empirically explores how women who are members of UK-based women-only networks for women working in the media and communications industries blog about the menopause, specifically Bloom (www.bloomnetwork.uk), Women in Advertising and Communications Leadership (www.wacl.info), and Women in Public Relations (www.womeninpr. org). The overarching research question in this paper is: How do women who are members of women-only networks for women working in communications blog about the menopause? I seek to answer this question by exploring whether the selected blog posts’ texts on the websites of women-only networks have a feminist and/or postfeminist sensibility. Specifically, do they engender an individualistic approach and/or promote solidarity? Furthermore, I examine the texts for indications regarding the ‘sources and solutions for gender inequality in the workplace’ (Gill, Orgad 2015: 340) and ask: What can this tell us about the networks’ position vis-à-vis the menopause, feminism, and postfeminism? Discourse analysis reveals an entanglement of feminist and postfeminist sensibilities in the narratives constructed in the blogs, which can be characterised by two main interpretative repertoires, Stigma and Support, the implications of which call for multilevel and multifaceted changes to support mid-life women in the contemporary media and communications workplace and beyond.

Keywords: women in communications; blogging the menopause; women-only networks

Received: May 3, 2024; Revised: November 13, 2024; Accepted: November 14, 2024; Published: January 9, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Darmon, Keren. 2024. "Time to Change the 'Change': Stigma and Support in Blogs about the Menopause." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 25(2):93-116.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ANA, AIMM. 2022. A Diversity Report for the Advertising/Marketing Industry.
    2. British Menopause Society. 2022. What Is the Menopause? Retrieved 8/11/2024 (ttps://thebms.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/17-bms-tfc-what-is-the-menopause-august2023-a.pdf).
    3. Brunskell, H. 1998. Feminist Methodology. Pp. 37-47 in C. Seale (ed.). Researching Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications.
    4. Bryson, V. 2003. Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    5. Carstensen, T. 2014. Gender and Social Media: Sexism, Empowerment, or the Irrelevance of Gender? Pp. 483-492 in C. Carter, L. Steiner, L. McLaughlin (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Media and Gender. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    6. Carter, C. 2014. Online Popular Anti-Sexism Political Action in the UK and USA: The Importance of Collaborative Anger for Social Change. Pp. 643-653 in C. Carter, L. Steiner, L. McLaughlin (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Media and Gender. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    7. Castells, M. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    8. CIPR and Chalkstream. 2024. PR Population Report. London: CIPR.
    9. Coleman, S. 2005. Blogs and the New Politics of Listening. Political Quarterly 76 (2): 272-280. Go to original source...
    10. Conor, B., R. Gill, S. Taylor. 2015. Gender and Creative Labour. The Sociological Review 63(1_suppl): 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12237. Go to original source...
    11. Criado Perez, C. 2019. Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. London: Penguin Random House.
    12. Darmon, K. 2017. Representing SlutWalk London in Mass and Social Media: Negotiating Feminist and Postfeminist Sensibilities. PhD, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
    13. Darmon, K. 2024. Women-Only Networking in Public Relations: Discourse Analysis of the Entanglement of Barriers and Benefits. Pp. 231-245 in Women's Work in Public Relations. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Go to original source...
    14. Dow, B. J. 1995. Feminism, Difference(s), and Rhetorical Studies. Communication Studies 46 (1-2): 106-117, https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368442. Go to original source...
    15. Eagleton-Pierce, M. 2016. Neoliberalism: The Key Concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.
    16. Gajjala, R., Y. J. Oh. 2012. Cyberfeminism 2.0: Where Have All the Cyberfeminists Gone? Pp. 1-9 in R. Gajjala, Y. J. Oh (eds.). Cyberfeminism 2.0. New York and Oxford: Peter Lang.
    17. Gill, R. 1995. Relativism, Reflexivity and Politics: Interrogating Discourse Analysis from a Feminist Perspective. Pp. 165-186 in S. Wilkinson, C. Kitzinger (eds.). Feminism and Discourse: Psychological perspectives. London: Sage Publications.
    18. Gill, R. 1996. Discourse Analysis: Practical Implementation. Pp. 141-58 in J. T. E. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Leicester: BPS Books.
    19. Gill, R. 2007. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    20. Gill, R. 2009. Mediated Intimacy and Postfeminism: A Discourse Analytic Examination of Sex and Relationships Advice in a Women's Magazine. Discourse & Communication 3 (4): 345-369. Go to original source...
    21. Gill, R. 2016. Post-Postfeminism?: New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist Times. Feminist Media Studies 16 (4): 610-630, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293. Go to original source...
    22. Gill, R, E. K. Kelan, C. M. Scharff. 2017. A Postfeminist Sensibility at Work. Gender, Work & Organization 24 (3): 226-244, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12132. Go to original source...
    23. Gill, R., S. Orgad. 2015. The Confidence Cult(Ure). Australian Feminist Studies 30 (86): 324-344, https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2016.1148001. Go to original source...
    24. Global Women in PR. 2022a. Global Women in PR: Annual Index 2022. London: GWPR.
    25. Global Women in PR. 2022b. www.globalwpr.com. London: GWPR.
    26. Global Women in PR. 2023. Global Women in PR Annual Index 2023. London: GWPR. Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://globalwpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/gwpr-annual-index-2023.pdf).
    27. Greer, G. 2019. The Change: Women, Ageing and the Menopause. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    28. Hesse-Biber, S. N. 2012. Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. 2nd ed. Online: Sage Publications. Go to original source...
    29. Jacobs, E. 2023. Only Connect: Hybrid Work Fuels Demand for Female Networks. www.ft.com.
    30. Jacobs, E. 2024. Menopause Support Must Tread a Fine Line between Awareness and Stigma. Financial Times, 7 May 2023. Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://www.ft.com/content/9b239dfb-78c7-49f9-9498-6048b0117de9).
    31. Jeffery, P. 2023. Social Reproduction Theory: The Marxist Critique We Need Now. Fairer Disputations. Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://fairerdisputations.org/social-reproduction-theory-the-marxist-critique-we-need-now/).
    32. Jermyn, D. 2023. 'Everything You Need to Embrace the Change': The 'Menopausal Turn'in Contemporary UK Culture. Journal of Aging Studies 64: 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101114. Go to original source...
    33. Keller, J. M. 2012. Virtual Feminisms. Information, Communication and Society 15 (3): 429-447. Go to original source...
    34. Keller, J. M. 2016. Girls' Feminist Blogging in a Postfeminist Age. New York and Abingdon: Routledge. Go to original source...
    35. Lacey, N., D. Perrons. 2015. Confronting Gender Inequality: Findings from the LSE Commission on Gender, Inequality and Power. London: LSE.
    36. Lazar, M. M. 2007. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 4 (2): 141-164, https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816. Go to original source...
    37. Lazar, M. M. 2009. Communicating (Post)Feminisms in Discourse. Discourse & Communication 3 (4): 339-344, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309343856. Go to original source...
    38. Link, B. G., J. C. Phelan. 2001. Conceptualizing Stigma. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 363-385. Go to original source...
    39. McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    40. Mendes, K. 2015. Slutwalk: Feminism, Activism and Media. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    41. Miller, V. 2008. New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (4): 387-400, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856508094659. Go to original source...
    42. Orgad, S., C. Rottenberg. 2023. The Menopause Moment: The Rising Visibility of 'the Change' in UK News Coverage. European Journal of Cultural Studies 27 (4): 519-539, https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231159562. Go to original source...
    43. Pini, B., K. Brown, C. Ryan. 2004. Women-Only Networks as a Strategy for Change? A Case Study from Local Government. Women in Management Review 19 (6): 286-292, https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420410555051. Go to original source...
    44. Potter, J. 1996. Discourse Analysis and Constructionist Approaches: Theoretical Background. Pp. 125-40 in J. T. E. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Leicester: BPS Books.
    45. Potter, J., M. Wetherell. 1994. Analyzing Discourse. Pp. 47-66 in A. Bryman, R. G. Burgess (eds.). Analyzing Qualitative Data. London and New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
    46. PRCA. 2020. PRCA 2020 Census Report. Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://news.prca.org.uk/empathy-and-ethics-must-form-the-heart-of-prs-recovery-2020-prca-pr-census/).
    47. Reinharz, S. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    48. Silverstone, R. 1999. Why Study the Media? Thousand Oaks, CA, and London: Sage Publications. Go to original source...
    49. Smith, V. 2024. The Menopause Is No Joke. The Critic, 21 January, 1-6.
    50. Sørensen, S. Ø. 2017. The Performativity of Choice: Postfeminist Perspectives on Work-Life Balance. Gender, Work & Organization 24 (3): 297-313, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12163. Go to original source...
    51. Spector, A., Z. Li, L. He, Y. Badawy, R. Desai. 2024. The Effectiveness of PsychosocialInterventions on Non-Physiological Symptoms of Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 352: 460-472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.048. Go to original source...
    52. Steffan, B. 2021. Managing Menopause at Work: The Contradictory Nature of Identity Talk. Gender, Work & Organization 28 (1): 195-214, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12539. Go to original source...
    53. Steffan, B. 2024. Book Review: Menopause Transitions and the Workplace: Theorizing Transitions, Responsibilities and Interventions. Management Learning 55 (5). Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384990644_Book_Review_Menopause_Transitions_and_the_Workplace_Theorizing_Transitions_Responsibilities_and_Interventions), https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076241236473. Go to original source...
    54. Thumim, N. 2012. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    55. Tonkiss, F. 1998. Analysing Discourse. Pp. 245-260 in C. Seale (ed.). Researching Society and Culture. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    56. Topic, M., C. Carbery, A. Arrigoni, T. Clayton, N. Kyriakidou, C. Gatewood, S. Shafique, S. Halliday. 2021. Women and Networking: A Systematic Literature Review (1985-2021). Leeds: Leeds Beckett University.
    57. Toth, E. L., L. Aldoory. 2021. Women in Public Relations: A Feminist Perspective. Pp. 45-60 in C. Valentini (ed.). Public Relations: Handbooks of Communication Sciences. Vol. 27, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    58. Villesèche, F., E. Meliou, and H. K. Jha. 2022. Feminism in Women's Business Networks: A Freedom-Centred Perspective. Human Relations 75 (10): 1903-1927, https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221083665. Go to original source...
    59. Waddington, S. 2024. The Privileged Role of Men Working in Public Relations. Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://wadds.co.uk/blog/2024/2/1/cipr-pr-population-report).
    60. Wajcman, J. 2000. Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State Is the Art? Social Studies of Science 30 (3): 447-464. Go to original source...
    61. Wetherell, M., J. Potter. 1988. Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires. Pp. 168-183 in C. Antaki (ed.). Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods. London: Sage Publications.
    62. Willson, M. 2009. The Possibilities of Network Sociality. Pp. 493-505 in International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Go to original source...
    63. Wittel, A. 2001. Toward a Network Sociality. Theory, Culture & Society 18 (6): 51-76. Go to original source...
    64. Women in PR. 2022. What We Do. Retrieved 8/11/2024 (https://womeninpr.org.uk/what-we-do/).
    65. Yeomans, L. 2020. The 'Acceptable Face of Feminism' in the UK Public Relations Industry: Senior Women's Discourse and Performativity within the Neoliberal Firm. Pp. 39-47 in A. Adi, E. Ayme-Yahil (eds.). Women in PR: Research and opinions about the status, challenges and future of women working in PR/communications. Berlin: Quadriga University of Applied Sciences.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content