Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2013, 14 (1): 3-14

Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs

Marieke Van den Brink, Yvonne Benschop

Academic excellence is allegedly a universal and gender neutral standard of merit. This article examines exactly what is constructed as academic excellence at the micro-level, how evaluators operationalize this construct in the criteria they apply in academic evaluation, and how gender inequalities are imbued in the construction and evaluation of excellence. We challenge the view that the academic world is governed by the normative principle of meritocracy in its allocation of rewards and resources. Based on an empirical study of professorial appointments in the Netherlands, we argue that academic excellence is an evasive social construct that is inherently gendered. We show how gender is practiced in the evaluation of professorial candidates, resulting in disadvantages for women and privileges for men that accumulate to produce substantial inequalities in the construction of excellence.

Published: March 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Van den Brink, Marieke and Yvonne Benschop. 2013. "Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs." Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research 14(1):3-14.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acker, J. 1990. "Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations." Gender and Society, Vol. 4, No. 2: 139-185. Go to original source...
    2. Acker, J. 1992. "Gendering Organizational Theory." Pp. 248-60 in Mills, A. J.,Tancred, P. (eds.). Gendering Organizational Analysis. London: Sage.
    3. Acker, J. 2006. "Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations." Gender and Society, Vol. 20, No. 4: 441. Go to original source...
    4. Adler, N. J., Harzing, A.-W. 2009. "When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Ranking." Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 8, No. 1: 72-95. Go to original source...
    5. Alvesson, M., Billing, Y. D. 2009. Understanding Gender and Organizations. London: Sage. Go to original source...
    6. Anderson, C., Shirako, A. 2008. "Are Individuals' Reputations Related to Their History of Behavior?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 2: 320-333. Go to original source...
    7. Bagilhole, B., Goode, J. 2001. "The Contradiction of the Myth of Individual Merit, and the Reality of a Patriarchal Support System in Academic Careers; a Feminist Investigation." The European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2: 161-180. Go to original source...
    8. Banaji, M., Greenwald, A. 1995. "Implicit Gender Stereotyping in Judgments of Fame." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 68, No. 2: 181-198. Go to original source...
    9. Barry, J., Berg, E., Chandler, J. 2006. "Academic Shape Shifting: Gender, Management and Identities in Sweden and England." Organization, Vol. 13, No. 2: 275-298. Go to original source...
    10. Basu, A. 2006. "Using ISI's "Highly Cited Researchers" to Obtain a Country Level Indicator of Citation Excellence." Scientometrics, Vol. 68, No. 3: 361-375. Go to original source...
    11. Benschop, Y. 2009. "The Micropolitics of Gendering in Networking." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 16, No. 2: 217-237. Go to original source...
    12. Bird, S. R. 1996. "Welcome to the Men's Club: Homosociality and the Maintenance of Hegemonic Masculinity." Gender and Society, Vol. 10, No. 2: 120-132. Go to original source...
    13. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.-D. 2007. "Gender Differences in Grant Peer Review: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 1, No. 3: 226-238. Go to original source...
    14. Borum, F., Hansen, H. F. 2000. "The Local Construction and Enactment of Standards for Research Evaluation: The Case of the Copenhagen Business School." Evaluation, Vol. 6, No. 3: 281-299. Go to original source...
    15. Bourdieu, P. 1976. "Le Champ Scientifique." Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, Vol. 2, No. 3: 88-104. Go to original source...
    16. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    17. Calás, M., Smircich, L. 2006. "From the "Women's Point of View" Ten Years Later: Towards a Feminist Organization Studies." Pp. 284-346 in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T., Nord, W. (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage. Go to original source...
    18. Calás, M., Smircich, L. 2009. "Feminist Perspectives on Gender in Organizational Research: What is and is Yet to be." Pp. 246-269 in Buchanan, D. A., Bryman, A. (eds.). Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage.
    19. Castilla, E. J. 2008. "Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers." American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 113, No. 6: 1479-1526. Go to original source...
    20. Clark, B. R. 1987. The Academic Life. Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundations.
    21. Cole, M., Field, H., Giles, W. 2004. "Interaction of Recruiter and Applicant Gender in Resume Evaluation: A Field Study." Sex Roles, Vol. 51, No. 9/10: 597-608. Go to original source...
    22. Correl, S. J. 2004. "Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations." American Sociological Review, Vol. 69, No. 1: 93-113. Go to original source...
    23. De Weert, E. 2001. "Pressures and Prospects Facing the Academic Profession in the Netherlands." Higher Education, Vol. 41, No. 1: 77-101. Go to original source...
    24. Deem, R. 2009. "Leading and Managing Contemporary UK Universities: Do Excellence and Meritocracy still Prevail over Diversity?" Higher Education Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1: 3-17. Go to original source...
    25. Descarries, F. 2003. "The Hegemony of the English Language in the Academy: The Damaging Impact of the Sociocultural and Linguistic Barriers on the Development of Feminist Sociological Knowledge, Theories and Strategie." Current Sociology, Vol. 51, No. 6: 625-636. Go to original source...
    26. Dick, P., Nadin, S. 2006. "Reproducing Gender Inequalities? A Critique of Realist Assumptions Underpinning Personnel Selection Research and Practice." Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 3: 481-498. Go to original source...
    27. Dovidio, J., Gaertner, S. 2000. "Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions: 1989 and 1999." Psychological Science, Vol. 11, No. 4: 315-319. Go to original source...
    28. Ely, R. J., Meyerson, D. E. 2000. "Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change." Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22: 103-152. Go to original source...
    29. Essers, C. 2009. "Reflections on the Narrative Approach: Dilemmas of Power, Emotions and Social Location While Constructing Life-Stories." Organization, Vol. 16, No. 2: 163-181. Go to original source...
    30. EU. 2009. She Figures. Women and Science, Statistics and Indicators. Brussels: European Commission.
    31. Eustace, R. 1988. "The Criteria of Staff Selection, Do They Exist?" Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 1: 69-88. Go to original source...
    32. Eveline, J., Booth, M. 2004. "Don't Write About It": Writing "the Other" for the Ivory Basement." Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 17, No. 3: 243-255. Go to original source...
    33. Foschi, M. 1996. "Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women." Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 3: 237-254. Go to original source...
    34. Foschi, M. 2000. "Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research." Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 1: 21-42. Go to original source...
    35. Gherardi, S. 1994. "The Gender we Think, the Gender we Do in Our Everyday Organizational Lives." Human Relations, Vol. 47, No. 6: 591-610. Go to original source...
    36. Grandori, A. 1984. "A Prescriptive Contingency View of Organizational Decision Making." Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2: 192-209. Go to original source...
    37. Greenwald, A., Banaji, M. 1995. "Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-esteem, and Stereotypes." Psychological Reports, Vol. 102, No. 1: 4-27. Go to original source...
    38. Greenwald, A., Banaji, M., Rudman, L., Farnham, S., Nosek, B., Mellot, D. 2002. "A Unified Theory of Implicit Attitudes, Sereotypes, Self-esteem, and Self-concept." Psychological Review, Vol. 109, No. 1: 3-25. Go to original source...
    39. Hearn, J. 2004. "Personal Resistance through Persistence to Organizational Resistance through Distance." Pp. 40-63 in Thomas, R., Mills, A., Mills, J. H. (eds.). Identity Politics at Work: Resisting Gender, Gendering Resistence. Abingdon: Routledge. Go to original source...
    40. Hojat, M., Gonnella, J., Caelleigh, A. 2003. "Impartial Judgment by the "Gatekeepers" of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process." Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 8, No. 1: 75-96. Go to original source...
    41. Holgersson, C. 2003. Rekrytering av företagsledare. En studie i homosocialitet. Stockholm: EFI.
    42. Holvino, E., Kamp, A. 2009. "Diversity Management: Are We Moving in the Right Direction? Reflections from Both Sides of the North Atlantic." Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 4: 395-403. Go to original source...
    43. Hoobler, J. M. 2005 "Lip Service to Multiculturalism." Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 14, No. 1: 49-56. Go to original source...
    44. Husu, L. 2001. Sexism, Support and Survival in Academia. Academic Women and Hidden Discrimination in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Social Psychological Studies.
    45. Husu, L. 2004. "Gate-keeping, Gender Equality and Scientific Excellence." Pp. 69-76 in Brouns, M., Addis, E. (eds.). Gender and Excellence in the Making. Brussels: European Commission.
    46. Ibarra, H. 1997. "Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Network." Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 1: 91-102. Go to original source...
    47. Jain, D., Golosinski, M. 2009. "Sizing Up the Tyranny of the Ruler." The Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 8, No. 1: 99-105. Go to original source...
    48. Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C. 2007. "How Socially Connected are the Citers to those that they Cite?" Journal of Documentation, Vol. 63, No. 5: 609-637. Go to original source...
    49. Kanter, R. M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    50. Kantola, J. 2009. "Why Do All the Women Disappear?" Gendering Processes in a Political Science Department." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 15, No. 2: 202-225. Go to original source...
    51. Katila, S., Merilainen, S. 2002. "Metamorphosis: From "Nice Girls" to "Nice Bitches": Resisting Patriarchal Articulations of Professional Identity." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 9, No. 3: 336-354. Go to original source...
    52. Knights, D., Richards, W. 2003. "Sex Discrimination in UK Academia." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 10, No. 2: 213-238. Go to original source...
    53. Krefting, L. A. 2003. "Intertwined Discourses of Merit and Gender: Evidence from Academic Employment in the USA." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 10, No. 2: 260-278. Go to original source...
    54. Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
    55. Laudel, G. 2006. "The"Quality Myth": Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds." Higher Education, Vol. 52, No. 3: 375-403. Go to original source...
    56. Lawrence, P. A. 2003. "The Politics of Publication. Authors, Reviewers and Editor Must Act to Protect the Quality of Research." Nature, Vol. 422: 259-261. Go to original source...
    57. Lorber, J. 2005. Gender Inequality, Feminist Theories and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
    58. Mählck, P., Persson, O. 2000. "Socio-bibliometric Mapping of Intra-departmental Network." Scientometrics, Vol. 49, No. 1: 81-91. Go to original source...
    59. Martin, P. Y. 2003. " "Said and Done" versus "Saying and Doing": Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work." Gender and Society, Vol. 17, No. 3: 342-366. Go to original source...
    60. Martin, P. Y. 2006. "Practising Gender at Work: Further Thoughts on Reflexivity." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 13, No. 3: 254-276. Go to original source...
    61. Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J., Thomas, R., Davies, A. 2008. "Hegemonic Academic Practices. Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery." Organization, Vol. 15, No. 4: 584-597. Go to original source...
    62. Merton, R. C. 1973. The Sociology of Science; Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    63. Merton, R. K. 1968. "The Matthew Effect in Science." Science, Vol. 159, No. 3810: 56-63. Go to original source...
    64. Musselin, C. 2002. "Diversity around the Profile of the "Good" Candidate within French and German Universities." Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 8, No. 3: 243-258. Go to original source...
    65. Nkomo, S. M. 2009. "The Seductive Power of Academic Journal Rankings: Challenges of Searching for Otherwise." Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 8, No. 1: 106-112. Go to original source...
    66. Özbilgin, M. 2009. "From Journal Rankings to Making Sense of the World." Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 8, No. 1: 113-121. Go to original source...
    67. Palomba, R. 2004. "Does Gender Matter in Scientific Leadership?" Pp. 121-125 in Brouns, M., Addis, E. (eds.). Gender and Excellence in the Making. Brussels: European Commission.
    68. Paludi, M., Bauer, W. 1983. "Goldberg Revisited: What's in an Author's Name." Sex Roles, Vol. 9, No. 3: 387-390. Go to original source...
    69. Parker, M., Jary, D. 1995. "The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjektivity." Organization, Vol. 2, No. 2: 319-338. Go to original source...
    70. Poggio, B. 2006. "Editorial: Outline of a Theory of Gender Practices." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 13, No. 3: 225-233. Go to original source...
    71. Prasad, A., Prasad, P. 2002. "Otherness at Large: Identity and Difference in the New Globalized Organizational Landscape." Pp. 57-71 in Aaltio-Marjosola, I., Mills, A. J. (eds.). Gender, Identity and the Culture of Organizations. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    72. Ridgeway, C. 2001. "Gender, Status, and Leadership." Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 57, No. 4: 637-655. Go to original source...
    73. Rossiter, M. W. 1993. "The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science." Social Studies of Science, Vol. 23, No. 2: 325-341. Go to original source...
    74. Scully, M. A. 1997. "Meritocracy." Pp. 413-14 in Freeman, R. E.,Werhane, P. H. (eds.). Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    75. Scully, M. A. 2002. "Confronting Errors in the Meritocracy." Organization, Vol. 9, No. 3: 396-401. Go to original source...
    76. Seibert, S., Kraimer, M., Liden, R. 2001. "A Social Capital Theory of Career Success." The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2: 219-237. Go to original source...
    77. Slaughter, S., Leslie, L. L. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    78. Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., Ritzke, D. 1999. "The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study." Sex Roles, Vol. 41, No. 7/8: 509-528. Go to original source...
    79. Valian, V. 1998. Why So Slow: the Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Go to original source...
    80. Van den Brink, M. 2010. Behind the Scenes of Science: Gender Practices in Recruitment and Selection of Professors in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.
    81. Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y. 2008. "Practicing Gender in Academic Gatekeeping." Příspěvek přednesený na Academy of Management Meeting, srpen 2008, Anaheim.
    82. Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., Jansen, W. 2010. "Transparency as a Tool for Gender Equality." Organization Studies, Vol. 31, No. 12: 1459-1483. Go to original source...
    83. Van den Brink, M., Brouns, M. 2006. Gender and Excellence. Een landelijk onderzoek naar Benoemingsprocedures van Hoogleraren. Den Haag: OCW.
    84. Van den Brink, M., Stobbe, L. 2009. "Doing Gender in Academic Education: The Paradox of Visibility." Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 16, No. 4: 451-470. Go to original source...
    85. Van Engen, M., Bleijenbergh, I., Paauwe, J. 2008. Vrouwen in Hogere Wetenschappelijke Posities aan de Universiteit Tilburg. Processen van Instroom, Doorstroom en Uitstroom nad
    86. Yanow, D. 2006. "Talking about Practices: On Julian Orr's Talking About Machines." Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No. 12: 1743-1756. Go to original source...
    87. Zanoni, P., Janssens, M. 2004. "Deconstructing Difference: The Rhetoric of Human Resource Managers' Diversity Discourses." Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1: 55-74. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content