Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2018, 19 (1): 58-81 | DOI: 10.13060/25706578.2018.19.1.405

Care Allowance as 'Special Money': The Meanings and Uses of the Care Allowance in Close Relationships

Radka Dudová
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.

The paper presents the comparative results of two qualitative researches on long-term informal family care in the Czech Republic: one researching the life strategies of women caring for their elderly parents and the other researching women caring for a child with a disability. The interviews with the two groups of caregivers make it possible to compare the ways in which people in different caring situations interpret and use the same state benefit intended for people who need personal long-term care. The analysis shows how the individual understanding of the same benefit is shaped by cultural values and norms, leading to the use of the money in distinct ways, which then has specific consequences for the economic situation of caring women. While the mothers caring for a disabled child view the benefit as their work income, which they are entitled to by the fact that they are providing care, the caring daughters (and sons) understand the allowance as money that belongs to their elderly parent and earmark it for the parent´s special needs. They do not interpret or use this money in accordance with the intentions of policy-makers because they fear they could be accused of commodifying the care or breaching the norm of intergenerational solidarity. I therefore argue that different situations of care require different policy solutions. In the situation of care for an elderly parent, in the context of a country with strong norms of intergenerational solidarity and a high proportion of informal care, the measures of financial support for end users have proved ineffective as financial support for caregivers.

Keywords: Cash for care, long term care, family, intergenerational relationships, money

Published: March 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dudová, Radka. 2018. "Care Allowance as 'Special Money': The Meanings and Uses of the Care Allowance in Close Relationships." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 19(1):58-81.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson, E. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Bergqvist, C., Saxonberg, S. 2017. "The State as a Norm-Builder? The Take-up of Parental Leave in Norway and Sweden." Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 51, No. 7: 1470-1487, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/spol.12251/full. Go to original source...
  3. Bertaux, D., Kohli, M. 1984. "The Life Story Approach: A Continental View." Annual Review of Sociology, No. 10: 215-237, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.001243. Go to original source...
  4. Bode, I., 2007. "New Moral Economies of Welfare: The Case of Domiciliary Elder Care in Germany, France and Britain." European Societies, Vol. 9, No. 2: 201-227, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690601002574. Go to original source...
  5. Clarke, J., Newman, J. 1997. The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.
  6. Dudová, R. 2013. Sociální postavení neformálně pečujících osob a jejich možnosti vstupu na trh práce. Praha: Kontaktní informační středisko pro osoby ze z. p. a seniory. Dostupné z: http://www.kisinfo.cz/page/20-vystupy-projektu/.
  7. Dudová, R. 2015. Postarat se ve stáří. Rodina a zajištění péče o seniory. Praha: SLON.
  8. Dudová, R., Vohlídalová, M. 2018. "Muži a ženy pečující o seniory v rodině." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Vol. 54, No. 2: 219-251. Go to original source...
  9. Hubíková, O. 2012. "Přímé platby za péči v kontextu nevyjasněného statusu neformální péče." Sociální práce, č. 4: 113-125.
  10. Challis, D., Davies, B. 1980. "A New Approach to Community Care for the Elderly." British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 10, No. 1: 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a054475. Go to original source...
  11. Jacobs, M. T. 2003. "Paying for Informal Care: A Contradictio in Terminis?" European Societies, Vol. 5, No. 4: 397-417, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127660. Go to original source...
  12. Jeřábek, H. a kol. 2013. Mezigenerační solidarita v péči o seniory. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  13. Jeřábková, V., Průša, L. 2013. Příspěvek na péči. Praha: VÚPSV.
  14. Luscher, K., Pillemer, K. 1998. "Intergenerational Ambivalence: A New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 60, No. 2: 413-425, www.jstor.org/stable/353858. Go to original source...
  15. Lyon, D. 2010. "Intersections and Boundaries of Work and Non-Work." European Societies, Vol. 12, No. 2: 163-185, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1461669090310 0456. Go to original source...
  16. Milligan, C. 2009. There's No Place Like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society. London: Routledge.
  17. Průša, L. 2013. Ekonomická efektivita zajišťování péče o příjemce příspěvku na péči. Praha: VÚPSV.
  18. Saraceno, C. 2016. "Varieties of Familialism: Comparing four Southern European and East Asian Welfare Regimes." Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 4: 314-326, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716657275. Go to original source...
  19. Ungerson, C. 1995. "Gender, Cash and Informal Care: European Perspectives and Dilemmas." Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 24, No. 1: 31-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004727940002451X. Go to original source...
  20. Ungerson, C. 1997. "Give Them the Money: Is Cash a Route to Empowerment?" Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 31, No. 1: 45-53, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9515.00036. Go to original source...
  21. Valenta, M., Michalík, J. 2008. Výzkum pracovních kompetencí osob pečujících o člena rodiny se zdravotním postižením na území Hlavního města Prahy. Praha: VCIZP. Dostupné z: http://www.vcizp.cz/doc/vcizp-quality-life-zprava-celek.pdf.
  22. Wija, P. 2013. "Jaká je kapacita a struktura dlouhodobé péče v České republice?" Geriatrie a gerontologie, roč. 2,č. 3: 122-127.
  23. Zelizer, V. A. 1989. "The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies."" American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 95, No. 2: 342-377. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780903. Go to original source...
  24. Zelizer, V. A. 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.