Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2023, 24 (2): 171-194 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2023.012

The Sexual Subjectivity of Women, Agency, and Empowerment: A Critical Conceptual Analysis

Miroslava Šudila Žilinská ORCID...a, Gabriel Bianchi ORCID...a
a Ústav výskumu sociálnej komunikácie SAV, v. v. i.

Sexual subjectivity in women together with sexual agency and empowerment have been receiving growing attention in sex research in recent decades. In this article we highlight the conceptual uncertainty and challenges research field, mostly in the context of #MeToo initiatives and the current discussion around understanding sexual violence in Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. We propose a conceptual map, in which we show the key role of sexual subjectivity for sexuality research, in contrast to other terms, such as sexual self-
-concept or sexual self-schema. We demonstrate how the important conceptual components of subjectivity, sexual agency, and empowerment have been misunderstood in the postfeminist and neoliberal discourse and have brought new forms of oppression to female sexuality – in the forms of the agency imperative and pseudoempowerment. The article offers an integrated conceptual framework for female sexual subjectivity based on a critical reflection of existing sexuality research from the perspective of second-order psychology as opposed to mainstream positivist approaches. We propose adopting approaches to sexual subjectivity that (1) allow us to reflect on the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal scripting rooted in normative social and cultural contexts, while (2) allowing for the authentic experience of lived, selfgenerated, and diverse subjectivities.

Keywords: sexual subjectivity, sexual agency, sexual empowerment

Received: October 27, 2022; Revised: November 17, 2023; Accepted: November 30, 2023; Published: January 6, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šudila Žilinská, Miroslava and Gabriel Bianchi. 2023. "The Sexual Subjectivity of Women, Agency, and Empowerment: A Critical Conceptual Analysis." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 24(2):171-194.
Download citation

References

  1. Amnesty International Česká republika. (n.d.). Chce to souhlas. Stiahnuté 20. 3. 2023 (https://www.amnesty.cz/chcetosouhlas).
  2. Amnesty International Slovensko. 2023. Slovenská verejnosť si uvedomuje dôležitosť súhlasu pri sexe. Kedy si to uvedomia aj politici? Stiahnuté 11. 3. 2023 (https://www.amnesty.sk/slovenska-verejnost-si-uvedomuje-dolezitost-suhlasu-pri-sexe-kedy-si-to-uvedomia-aj-politici/).
  3. Andersen, B. L., J. M. Cyranowski. 1994. Women's Sexual Self-Schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (6): 1079-1100, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1079. Go to original source...
  4. Andersen, B. L., J. M. Cyranowski, D. Espindle. 1999. Men's Sexual Self-Schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (4): 645-661, https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.4.645. Go to original source...
  5. Bal, M. 2009. Working with Concepts. European Journal of English Studies 13 (1): 13-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570802708121. Go to original source...
  6. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. 2012. Recovering Empowerment: De-Personalizing and Re-Politicizing Adolescent Female Sexuality. Sex Roles 66 (11-12): 713-717, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0070-x. Go to original source...
  7. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. 2015a. Living in Metaphors, Trapped in a Matrix: The Ramifications of Neoliberal Ideology for Young Women's Sexuality. Sex Roles 73 (7): 332-339, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0541-6. Go to original source...
  8. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. 2015b. The Agency Line: A Neoliberal Metric for Appraising Young Women's Sexuality. Sex Roles 73 (7-8): 279-291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6. Go to original source...
  9. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. 2019. Agency Is Everywhere, but Agency Is Not Enough: A Conceptual Analysis of Young Women's Sexual Agency. The Journal of Sex Research 56 (4-5): 462-474, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1578330. Go to original source...
  10. Bianchi, G. 2013. Nové podoby sexuality, občianstva, noriem a reprodukcie: svet a Slovensko. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review 45 (1): 5-26.
  11. Bianchi, G. 2020. Sexuality: From Intimacy to Politics: With Focus on Slovakia in the Globalized World. Berlin, DE: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. Go to original source...
  12. Bianchi, G. 2022. Figurations of Human of Subjectivity: Contribution to Second-Order Psychology. Basingstoke, UK and New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  13. Bianchi, G., L. Reháková. 2013. Konštrukcia Hranice Ne-Želaného Sexu. Pp. 47-52 in A. Neusar, L. Vavrysová (eds.). Kvalitativní přístup a metody ve vědách o člověku XII : Hranice normality : sborník příspěvků z XII. ročníku česko-slovenské konference s mezinárodní účastí. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
  14. Braidotti, R. 2009. Postsecular Feminist Ethics. Pp. 40-62 in E. H. Oleksy (ed.). Intimate Citizenships. London, UK: Routledge.
  15. Brown, P., P. Stenner. 2009. Psychology without Foundations: History, Philosophy and Psychosocial Theory. London, UK: Sage. Go to original source...
  16. Bryant, J., T. Schofield. 2007. Feminine Sexual Subjectivities: Bodies, Agency and Life History. Sexualities 10 (3): 321-340, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460707078321. Go to original source...
  17. Burkett, M., K. Hamilton. 2012. Postfeminist Sexual Agency: Young Women's Negotiations of Sexual Consent. Sexualities 15 (7): 815-833, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076. Go to original source...
  18. Cense, M. 2018. Rethinking Sexual Agency: Proposing a Multicomponent Model Based on Young People's Life Stories. Sex Education 19 (3): 247-262, https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1535968. Go to original source...
  19. Cense, M., L. Bay-Cheng, L. Dijk. 2018. Do I Score Points If I Say "No"?': Negotiating Sexual Boundaries in a Changing Normative Landscape. Journal of Gender-Based Violence 2 (2) : 277-291, https://doi.org/10.1332/239868018X15266373560443. Go to original source...
  20. Chmielewski, J. F., C. P. Bowman, D. L. Tolman. 2020. Pathways to Pleasure and Protection: Exploring Embodiment, Desire, and Entitlement to Pleasure as Predictors of Black and White Young Women's Sexual Agency. Psychology of Women Quarterly 44 (3): 307-322, https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320917395. Go to original source...
  21. Costa, C., C. Nogueira, F. López. 2009. 'My Sexual Self, I Stifled It': Sexual Subjectivities among Young Portuguese Women. Culture, Health & Sexuality 11 (4): 431-442, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050802710253. Go to original source...
  22. Crawford, J., S. Kippax, C. Waldby. 1994. Women's Sex Talk and Men's Sex Talk: Different Worlds. Feminism & Psychology 4 (4): 571-587, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353594044010. Go to original source...
  23. Curt, B. C. 1994. Textuality and Tectonics : Troubling Social and Psychological Science. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  24. Curtin, N., L. M. Ward, A. Merriwether, A. Caruthers. 2011. Femininity Ideology and Sexual Health in Young Women: A Focus on Sexual Knowledge, Embodiment, and Agency. International Journal of Sexual Health 23 (1): 48-62, https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2010.524694. Go to original source...
  25. Davidson, D. 1971. Agency. Pp. 1-37 in A. Marras, R. N. Bronaugh, R. W. Binkley (eds.). Agent, Action, and Reason. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.
  26. Davies, B., R. Harré. 1990. Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43-63, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x. Go to original source...
  27. European Institute for Gender Equality. 2016. Empowerment of Women. Stiahnuté June 25. 6. 2022 (https://eige.europa.eu/taxonomy/term/1102).
  28. Fahs, B. 2014. 'Freedom to' and 'Freedom from': A New Vision for Sex-Positive Politics. Sexualities 17 (3): 267-290, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713516334. Go to original source...
  29. Fahs, B., S. I. McClelland. 2016. When Sex and Power Collide: An Argument for Critical Sexuality Studies. The Journal of Sex Research 53 (4-5): 392-416, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152454. Go to original source...
  30. Fahs, B., E. Swank, S. I. McClelland. 2018. Sexuality, Pleasure, Power, and Danger: Points of Tension, Contradiction, and Conflict. Pp. 229-47 in C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, and K. F. Wyche (eds.). APA Handbook of the Psychology of Women: History, Theory, and Battlegrounds (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Go to original source...
  31. Fahs, B., E. Swank, A. Shambe. 2020. I Just Go with It': Negotiating Sexual Desire Discrepancies for Women in Partnered Relationships. Sex Roles 83 (3): 226-239, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01098-w. Go to original source...
  32. Fine, M. 1988. Sexuality, Schooling, and Adolescent Females: The Missing Discourse of Desire. Harvard Educational Review 58 (1): 29-53, https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242. Go to original source...
  33. Foucault, M. (1988) 2000. Moc, subjekt a sexualita: výber z článkov a rozhovorov publikovaných v rokoch 1980-1988. Preložené M. Marcelli. Bratislava, SK: Kalligram.
  34. Frie, R. 2008. Introduction: The Situated Nature of Psychological Agency. Pp. 1-32 in R. Frie (ed.). Psychological Agency: Theory, Practice, and Culture. Cambridge, UK and Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press. Go to original source...
  35. Gavey, N. 2012. Beyond 'Empowerment'? Sexuality in a Sexist World. Sex Roles 66 (11): 718-724, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0069-3. Go to original source...
  36. Gill, R. 2003. From Sexual Objectification to Sexual Subjectification: The Resexualisation of Women's Bodies in the Media. Feminist Media Studies 3 (1): 100-106, https://doi.org/10.1080/1468077032000080158. Go to original source...
  37. Gill, R. 2007. Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10 (2): 147-166, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898. Go to original source...
  38. Gill, R. 2008. Culture and Subjectivity in Neoliberal and Postfeminist Times. Subjectivity 25, https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.28. Go to original source...
  39. Gill, R. 2012. Media, Empowerment and the 'Sexualization of Culture' Debates. Sex Roles 66 (11): 736-745, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1. Go to original source...
  40. Gill, R., N. Donaghue. 2013. As If Postfeminism Had Come True: The Turn to Agency in Cultural Studies of 'Sexualisation.' Pp. 240-258 in S. Madhok, A. Phillips, K. Wilson (eds.). Gender, Agency, and Coercion. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  41. Gill, R., E. K. Kelan, C. M. Scharff. 2017. A Postfeminist Sensibility at Work. Gender, Work & Organization 24 (3): 226-244, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12132. Go to original source...
  42. Gunnarsson, L. 2018. "Excuse Me, but Are You Raping Me Now?" Discourse and Experience in (the Grey Areas of) Sexual Violence. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 26 (1): 4-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2017.1395359. Go to original source...
  43. Hensel, D. J., J. D. Fortenberry, L. F. O'Sullivan, D. P. Orr. 2011. The Developmental Association of Sexual Self-Concept with Sexual Behavior among Adolescent Women. Journal of Adolescence 34 (4): 675-684, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.005. Go to original source...
  44. Hindes, S., B. Fileborn. 2019. Girl Power Gone Wrong: #MeToo, Aziz Ansari, and Media Reporting of (Grey Area) Sexual Violence. Feminist Media Studies 20 (5): 639-656, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1606843. Go to original source...
  45. Horne, S., M. J. Zimmer-Gembeck. 2005. Female Sexual Subjectivity and Well-Being: Comparing Late Adolescents with Different Sexual Experiences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2 (3): 25-40, https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.3.25. Go to original source...
  46. Horne, S., M. J. Zimmer-Gembeck. 2006. The Female Sexual Subjectivity Inventory: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Inventory for Late Adolescents and Emerging Adults. Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (2): 125-138, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00276.x. Go to original source...
  47. Jackson, D. L. 2018. 'Me Too': Epistemic Injustice and the Struggle for Recognition. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4 (4): 1-19, https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6231. Go to original source...
  48. Jarkovská, L., K. Lišková. 2013. Tradice, Její rozpad a záchrana skrze sex: Diskurzivní strategie odpůrců sexuální výchovy. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 49 (2): 269-290. Go to original source...
  49. Kettrey, H. H. 2018. 'Bad Girls' Say No and 'Good Girls' Say Yes: Sexual Subjectivity and Participation in Undesired Sex during Heterosexual College Hookups. Sexuality & Culture 22 (3): 685-705, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9498-2. Go to original source...
  50. Konsent. 2021. Souhlas. - Konsent - náprava definice znásilnění. Stiahnuté 11. 3. 2023 (https://konsent.cz/souhlas/).
  51. Lamb, S. 2010. Feminist Ideals for a Healthy Female Adolescent Sexuality: A Critique. Sex Roles 62 (5): 294-306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1. Go to original source...
  52. Lamb, S., Z. D. Peterson. 2012. Adolescent Girls' Sexual Empowerment: Two Feminists Explore the Concept. Sex Roles 66 (11): 703-712, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3. Go to original source...
  53. Lerum, K., S. L. Dworkin. 2015. Sexual Agency Is Not a Problem of Neoliberalism: Feminism, Sexual Justice, & the Carceral Turn. Sex Roles 73 (7): 319-331, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0525-6. Go to original source...
  54. Libáková, L., V. Valkovičová, A. Jesenková. 2019. "Deti v tom majú jasno!": Sexuálna výchova a etika starostlivosti v naratívoch slovenského "Referenda o rodine" v roku 2015. Gender a výzkum 20 (1): 128-148. Go to original source...
  55. Linander, I., I. Goicolea, M. Wiklund, A. Gotfredsen, M. Strömbäck. 2021. Power and Subjectivity: Making Sense of Sexual Consent among Adults Living in Sweden. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 29 (2): 110-123, https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.1903553. Go to original source...
  56. Mark, K. P., L. M. Vowels. 2020. Sexual Consent and Sexual Agency of Women in Healthy Relationships Following a History of Sexual Trauma. Psychology & Sexuality 11 (4): 315-328, https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1769157. Go to original source...
  57. McClelland, S. 2011. Who Is the 'Self' in Self Reports of Sexual Satisfaction? Research and Policy Implications. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 8 (4): 304-320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9. Go to original source...
  58. McQueen, P. 2015. Subjectivity, Gender and the Struggle for Recognition. Basingstoke, UK and New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  59. O'Sullivan, L. F., H. F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg, I. W. McKeague. 2006. The Development of the Sexual Self-Concept Inventory for Early Adolescent Girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (8): 139-149, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00277.x. Go to original source...
  60. Ozkazanc-Pan, B. 2019. On Agency and Empowerment in a #MeToo World. Gender, Work & Organization 26 (8): 1212-1220, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12311. Go to original source...
  61. Peterson, Z. D. 2010. What Is Sexual Empowerment? A Multidimensional and Process-Oriented Approach to Adolescent Girls' Sexual Empowerment. Sex Roles 62 (5): 307-313, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9725-2. Go to original source...
  62. Plante, R. 2007. In Search of Sexual Subjectivities: Exploring the Sociological Construction of Sexual Selves. Pp. 31-48 in M. S. Kimmel (ed.). The Sexual Self: The Construction of Sexual Scripts. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Go to original source...
  63. Potki, R., T. Ziaei, M. Faramarzi, M. Moosazadeh, Z. Shahhosseini. 2017. Bio-Psycho-Social Factors Affecting Sexual Self-Concept: A Systematic Review. Electronic Physician 9 (9): 5172-5178, https://doi.org/10.19082/5172. Go to original source...
  64. Rutherford, A. 2018. Feminism, Psychology, and the Gendering of Neoliberal Subjectivity: From Critique to Disruption. Theory & Psychology 28 (5): 619-644, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194. Go to original source...
  65. Satinsky, S., K. Jozkowski. 2014. Female Sexual Subjectivity and Verbal Consent to Receiving Oral Sex. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 41 (4): 413-426, https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.918065. Go to original source...
  66. Schobert, K., S. Cooper, N. Fries, M. S. Chervillil. 2021. I Thought We Were Vibin': A Qualitative Exploration of Sexual Agency and Consent in Young People. Sexualities 24 (7): 906-921, https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607211026457. Go to original source...
  67. Simon, W. (1996) 2003. Postmodern Sexualities. Reprint, London, UK and New York, USA: Routledge. Go to original source...
  68. Simon, W., J. H. Gagnon. 1984. Sexual Scripts. Society 22 (1): 53-60, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701260. Go to original source...
  69. Simon, W., J. H. Gagnon. 1986. Sexual Scripts: Permanence and Change. Archives of Sexual Behavior 15 (2): 97-120, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219. Go to original source...
  70. Tolman, D. L. 2002. Dilemmas of Desire: Teenage Girls Talk about Sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  71. Tolman, D. L., S. M. Anderson, K. Belmonte. 2015. Mobilizing Metaphor: Considering Complexities, Contradictions, and Contexts in Adolescent Girls' and Young Women's Sexual Agency. Sex Roles 73 (7): 298-310, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0. Go to original source...
  72. Valkovičová, V. 2021. The Borders of Personal and Political: Argumentative Analysis of a (Possible) Sexual Harassment Case in the "#MeToo Era". Socialni studia 18 (2): 125-143, https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2021-2-125. Go to original source...
  73. Valkovičová, V., A. Kuruc. 2020. Nástroje Na Prevenciu Sexuálneho Obťažovania Ako Formy Rodovej Diskriminácie. Bratislava: Inštitút pre výskum práce a rodiny.
  74. Vance, C. S. 1984. Pleasure and Danger: Toward a Politics of Sexuality. Pp. 1-28 in C. S. Vance. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. London, UK: Routledge & K. Paul.
  75. Vanwesenbeeck, I., M. Cense, M. van Reeuwijk, J. Westeneng. 2021. Understanding Sexual Agency. Implications for Sexual Health Programming. Sexes 2 (4): 378-396, https://doi.org/10.3390/sexes2040030. Go to original source...
  76. Wallace, S. 2021. In Defence of Not-Knowing: Uncertainty and Contemporary Narratives of Sexual Violence. Feminist Theory 22 (4): 536-555, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120987387. Go to original source...
  77. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Sexual Health. Stiahnuté 30. 12. 2021 (https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/sexual-health).
  78. Zábrodská, K. 2009. Variace Na Gender: Poststrukturalismus, Diskursivní Analýza a Genderová Identita. Praha: Academia.
  79. Zouhar, M. 2016. Konceptuálna analýza v analytickej filozofii. Filozofia 71 (5): 410-424.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.